私はあなたが提供した表の赤色箇所をAに遡って確認しました。
Aには、それはCに存在しないと記載されています。
AにはD自体が存在しません。
本来Gに存在するが誤って取り除かれた。
最初に私が提供した内容と矛盾があるかもしれませんが、この内容を最新のものとして扱って下さい
現状と比べるとAの内容に誤りがある可能性があります。しかしそれはAを作成したEの責任で我々はそれの正誤の判断は出来ない。
またJはKと異なり総務の確認体制が不十分の様です。
回答を確認頂きもし私の誤認があればお知らせ下さい
Rating
53
Native
Translation / English
- Posted at 21 Aug 2020 at 14:39
I checked back A in the red portion of the table you provided.
It was recorded in A that C did not exist.
D itself also does not exist in A.
It was originally in G but was accidentally removed.
This may contradict the information I have provided earlier but please use this instead as it is the most updated.
When compared with the current situation, the contents of A may be incorrect. However, as E was responsible for creating A, it is not possible for us to evaluate whether it is right or wrong.
Please check if I have wrongly confirmed anything and let me know.
tgvicektx likes this translation
It was recorded in A that C did not exist.
D itself also does not exist in A.
It was originally in G but was accidentally removed.
This may contradict the information I have provided earlier but please use this instead as it is the most updated.
When compared with the current situation, the contents of A may be incorrect. However, as E was responsible for creating A, it is not possible for us to evaluate whether it is right or wrong.
Please check if I have wrongly confirmed anything and let me know.
Rating
51
Translation / English
- Posted at 21 Aug 2020 at 14:40
I went back to check the red parts on the chart that you gave me.
On A, it is written that it is not on C.
D itself doesn't exist on A.
It should have existed on G, but it was removed by mistake.
There might be contradict of the content that I firstly provided, however, please deal with this content as the latest version.
There is possibility that the content of A has error compared with the status quo. However, it should be E's responsibility of E that made A and we can't judge whether it should be right or not.
Also, J is different from K, and the confirmation system of the department of General affairs seems to be insufficient.
Please check my reply and let me know if I have some misunderstanding.
On A, it is written that it is not on C.
D itself doesn't exist on A.
It should have existed on G, but it was removed by mistake.
There might be contradict of the content that I firstly provided, however, please deal with this content as the latest version.
There is possibility that the content of A has error compared with the status quo. However, it should be E's responsibility of E that made A and we can't judge whether it should be right or not.
Also, J is different from K, and the confirmation system of the department of General affairs seems to be insufficient.
Please check my reply and let me know if I have some misunderstanding.
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 21 Aug 2020 at 14:41
I checked the red part to A given from you.
In A, it is said it does not exist in C.
In A, there is no existence of D itself.
Originally, it belongs to G was wrongly deleted.
Although there is a contradiction I gave to you, please take this as the first one.
Compare with recent state, there is a possibility of fault in A's content. However, it is A to be blamed, we cannot judge its pro-or-con.
Also, J differ from K, and it seems the general department's checking system is not enough.
Please let me know if you have any of my wrong understanding after you check the answer.
tgvicektx likes this translation
In A, it is said it does not exist in C.
In A, there is no existence of D itself.
Originally, it belongs to G was wrongly deleted.
Although there is a contradiction I gave to you, please take this as the first one.
Compare with recent state, there is a possibility of fault in A's content. However, it is A to be blamed, we cannot judge its pro-or-con.
Also, J differ from K, and it seems the general department's checking system is not enough.
Please let me know if you have any of my wrong understanding after you check the answer.
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 21 Aug 2020 at 14:39
I checked the red part of the list you provided to me by referring to A.
A says that it is not in C.
D is not in A.
It has been in G originally, but was deleted by mistake.
There might be contradiction from the details I provided in the beginning, but please use this one as the newest.
There might be a mistake in A in comparison with the current situation. But E who made A is responsible for it, and we cannot decide if it is correct or not.
J is different from K, and checking system of general affairs section is not sufficient.
Please check the answer, and let me know if you find my misunderstanding.
tgvicektx likes this translation
A says that it is not in C.
D is not in A.
It has been in G originally, but was deleted by mistake.
There might be contradiction from the details I provided in the beginning, but please use this one as the newest.
There might be a mistake in A in comparison with the current situation. But E who made A is responsible for it, and we cannot decide if it is correct or not.
J is different from K, and checking system of general affairs section is not sufficient.
Please check the answer, and let me know if you find my misunderstanding.
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 21 Aug 2020 at 14:45
I have confirmed the cells highlighted in red in the table provided from your end from the date going back to A.
According to A, it does not exist in C.
D itself does not exist in A.
It exists in G originally, but mistakenly removed.
Although this might be inconsistent with the content I have first provided, but please regard this content as the latest.
Comparing to the current state, an error might be found in A's content. However it is E's responsibility who created A, and we are not able to determine its validity.
Also, unlike K, J appears to have insufficient confirmation structure at General Affairs.
Please kindly confirm the response and let me know if there is anything wrong in my understanding.
tgvicektx likes this translation
According to A, it does not exist in C.
D itself does not exist in A.
It exists in G originally, but mistakenly removed.
Although this might be inconsistent with the content I have first provided, but please regard this content as the latest.
Comparing to the current state, an error might be found in A's content. However it is E's responsibility who created A, and we are not able to determine its validity.
Also, unlike K, J appears to have insufficient confirmation structure at General Affairs.
Please kindly confirm the response and let me know if there is anything wrong in my understanding.
![[deleted user]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
Rating
52
Translation / English
- Posted at 21 Aug 2020 at 14:49
I have just confirmed them to be referred to A at the marked in red where you instructed.
On A, that is mentioned as there's no such at C.
A doesn't have D itself.
It was removed wrongly by mistake as it is existed on D actually.
There might be a contradiction from my information, but please use the contents to the updated.
There might be some errors for the content of A compared to current situation.
But, A has been created by the responsibility of E, so that we aren't able to judge whether it is correct or not.
And, J is different from K, therefore, the confirmation system at the general affairs division isn't enough yet it seems.
Please let me know if there's my misunderstanding once you confirm the response.
tgvicektx likes this translation
On A, that is mentioned as there's no such at C.
A doesn't have D itself.
It was removed wrongly by mistake as it is existed on D actually.
There might be a contradiction from my information, but please use the contents to the updated.
There might be some errors for the content of A compared to current situation.
But, A has been created by the responsibility of E, so that we aren't able to judge whether it is correct or not.
And, J is different from K, therefore, the confirmation system at the general affairs division isn't enough yet it seems.
Please let me know if there's my misunderstanding once you confirm the response.
