1.トライアルの状況
・今後、多数のカスタマイズの要求が出てくる。しかし、ＳａａＳの利点を考えて、出来るだけそのまま使い
たい。
２．ＣＯＯ会議
・ＩＢＭ/ＥＲＰを推奨する予定。
・メンバーには、半強制的に利用させたい。
・私は、太郎さんに依頼され、ボランティアベースでやっているので、ニュートラルです。
・コストは、割り勘、または、本社負担になる。
最終的には、本社が持つことになると思う。
Rating
44
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Sep 2016 at 17:32
1. The status of the trial.
- We expect a lot of requests for customizing. However, by considering advantage of SaaS, we would like to use the system as is as much as possible.
2. COO meeting.
- We plan to recommend IBM/ERP.
- We would like to force members to use it practically .
- As I had been asked from Taro and am conducting this as a volunteer, so my position is neutral.
- Regarding the cost, bill-splitting bases or the headquarters will cover it.
I think the headquarters will cover the cost after all.
yamakawa1 likes this translation
- We expect a lot of requests for customizing. However, by considering advantage of SaaS, we would like to use the system as is as much as possible.
2. COO meeting.
- We plan to recommend IBM/ERP.
- We would like to force members to use it practically .
- As I had been asked from Taro and am conducting this as a volunteer, so my position is neutral.
- Regarding the cost, bill-splitting bases or the headquarters will cover it.
I think the headquarters will cover the cost after all.
![[deleted user]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
Rating
51
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Sep 2016 at 17:56
1, Trial
·There will be lots of demands of customize in the future. However, considering on the merits of SaaS, I would like to use it as it is.
2, COO conference
·IBM/ERP will be recommended
·Members must use it
·I am doing this as a volunteer Taro asked me so I am in the mutual.
·The cost will be either spirit or on the head office.
I think it will be on us eventually.
·There will be lots of demands of customize in the future. However, considering on the merits of SaaS, I would like to use it as it is.
2, COO conference
·IBM/ERP will be recommended
·Members must use it
·I am doing this as a volunteer Taro asked me so I am in the mutual.
·The cost will be either spirit or on the head office.
I think it will be on us eventually.
３．グローバル展開
・契約や具体的導入は、Ａ社がやる。仕事量が増えるので、Ａ社の陣容の強化が必要になる。
・本社が方針を決め、Ａ社が実行する形は変わらない。
・各社における導入をどうやっていくか、ＩＢＭと相談したい。
・ＩＤ，権限の付与はＡ社が行なう。
・マニュアルの作成
⇒今後の具体的展開は、本社とＡ社で相談して決める。今はまだ、検討段階で、決まったものはない。
Rating
44
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Sep 2016 at 17:38
3. Global deployment
- Regarding the contract or specific introduction, Company A will conduct it. As the amount of work of Company A increases, the reinforcement of the organization should be necessary.
- It is unchanged that the headquarters will decide the policy and that Company A conducts it.
- We would like to discuss how we introduce IBM/ERP specifically to each company with IBM.
- Company A will conduct to create the ID and to authorize.
- Developing the manual
=> Regarding the specific deployment in the future, the headquarter and Company A will discuss it, Currently we are on planning stage, so that nothing has been finalized yet.
- Regarding the contract or specific introduction, Company A will conduct it. As the amount of work of Company A increases, the reinforcement of the organization should be necessary.
- It is unchanged that the headquarters will decide the policy and that Company A conducts it.
- We would like to discuss how we introduce IBM/ERP specifically to each company with IBM.
- Company A will conduct to create the ID and to authorize.
- Developing the manual
=> Regarding the specific deployment in the future, the headquarter and Company A will discuss it, Currently we are on planning stage, so that nothing has been finalized yet.
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Sep 2016 at 17:44
3. Global deployment
・ Company A will execute for contract and actual introduction. Power up for lineup of company A will be required.
・ It is not changed that head office is determined for policy and company A is executed for that.
・ I want to consult with IBM how to introduce for each company.
・ Grant ID,authority is done by company A.
・ Make manual
⇒ Actual plan will be determined between head office and company A.
Now things are under planning and anything is not determined actually yet.
・ Company A will execute for contract and actual introduction. Power up for lineup of company A will be required.
・ It is not changed that head office is determined for policy and company A is executed for that.
・ I want to consult with IBM how to introduce for each company.
・ Grant ID,authority is done by company A.
・ Make manual
⇒ Actual plan will be determined between head office and company A.
Now things are under planning and anything is not determined actually yet.
