"fugo" の挙動について少し勘違いをしていたようでした.
このケースにおいては "hoge" の記述をしても期待する結果を得られそうです.
"fugo" と "hoge" を混在させていることがそもそもナンセンスでした.
ソースコード上では"hoge"は"bar"として解釈されていることを確認しました.
# "hoge"は"bar"をオーバーライドしているということを理解しました.
上記の理解で正しいでしょうか?
In this particular case, it seems that we can also get expected result by the description of "hoge".
As a matter of fact, it does have no meaning that we mixed up "fugo" and "hoge" together.
I have confirmed that "hoge" is interpreted a "bar" in the source code/
# I understood that "hoge" overrides "bar".
Is my understanding mentioned above right?
For this case, even with a description of "hoge" will bring expected result.
After all, it was nonsense to mix up "fugo" and "hoge".
I confirmed that "hoge" was interpreted as "bar" on source code.
I understood that # "hoge" overrides "bar".
Is my above understanding correct?
It is likely that a description of "hoge" on this case will help us gain some expecting results.
It was totally nonsense to have mixed with "fugo" and "hoge" in the first place.
I confirmed that "hoge" was interpreted as "bar " on the program.
I have also confiemd that # "hoge" is overriding "bar".
Am I right with my understanding above?