原文 / 日本語
コピー
A社とC社の会議レポートの中で気になる点がありました。
・今回のやり取りは、A社>B社>C社という経路で、A社の質問をC社に確認している。B社の中でも数名の人間を経由しており、コミュニケーションに時間がかかる。
技術的な質問はＡ社からC社に直接問い合わせしても問題ない・
評価
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/09 08:41:47に投稿されました
There was a point which is worrisome in a meeting report of A company and C company.
・This exchange is a course of A company > B company > C company, and is checking the question of A company for C company.
Via the man who is also several at the inside of B company, when, it takes time for communication.
Even if it asks C company a technical question directly and carries out it from A company, it is satisfactory.
・This exchange is a course of A company > B company > C company, and is checking the question of A company for C company.
Via the man who is also several at the inside of B company, when, it takes time for communication.
Even if it asks C company a technical question directly and carries out it from A company, it is satisfactory.
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/08 22:42:49に投稿されました
There are some points bothering me in the report of the Company A and Company C meeting.
- The future exchanges will go along the flow Company A>Company B> Company C, so Company C will check Company's problems. By passing by Company B, few Company B employees will have to work on it and the communication will cost extra time.
There are no problems for Company A to ask Company C directly when it is about technical problems.
- The future exchanges will go along the flow Company A>Company B> Company C, so Company C will check Company's problems. By passing by Company B, few Company B employees will have to work on it and the communication will cost extra time.
There are no problems for Company A to ask Company C directly when it is about technical problems.
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/08 22:50:22に投稿されました
In the report of the meeting between company A and company C there was a point that concerns me.
-The current exchange takes the route of company A > company B > company C, and questions of company A are being confirmed by company C. But through company B go several people, and communication takes time.
There's no problem even if practical questions are directly posed from company A to company C.
-The current exchange takes the route of company A > company B > company C, and questions of company A are being confirmed by company C. But through company B go several people, and communication takes time.
There's no problem even if practical questions are directly posed from company A to company C.
評価
57
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/09 12:32:16に投稿されました
I have some points on my mind about the report of the meeting between company A and C.
- The questions are exchanged by way of company A>company B>company C. We ask company C about company A's question. It is exchanged through some staffs in company B, so it will take some time to communicate.
It is all right to ask company C about company A's technical question directly.
- The questions are exchanged by way of company A>company B>company C. We ask company C about company A's question. It is exchanged through some staffs in company B, so it will take some time to communicate.
It is all right to ask company C about company A's technical question directly.
原文 / 日本語
コピー
A社は直接C社に確認した方が、レスポンスが早くなると考えているようです。
確かに時間的には早くなると思いますが、主な回答が遅い理由は、C社の回答が遅く、B社(我々)が回答できないケースが多いと思います。私はA社に技術的な質問は、B社では2名(私とあなた)しか入っていない事を説明しました。A社は理解してくれましたので、今後も今までとやり方は変わらないと思います。一点質問があります。ダイレクトにした方が早くなると回答したのは、C社でしょうか？
評価
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/09 08:36:48に投稿されました
Confirming it directly to C company seems to think that the response becomes early about A company. I think that it becomes early in terms of time, but an answer of Company C is slow, and the reason why a main answer is slow surely thinks that there are many cases which Company B (we) cannot reply.
The question with me technical for A company explained that only two persons (I and you) entered at B company.
A company understood. Therefore, I think that former and a way continue not to change.
There is an one-point question. Is it C company which answered that the way made direct became early?
The question with me technical for A company explained that only two persons (I and you) entered at B company.
A company understood. Therefore, I think that former and a way continue not to change.
There is an one-point question. Is it C company which answered that the way made direct became early?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/08 23:03:15に投稿されました
It seems you think that by having company A make questions directly to company C, the response will become more quick.
Of course I think that, timewise, that would be more quick, but I think the main reason why replies are slow is that company C's replies are late and there are many times when company B (that is us) cannot reply. I've explained how, as for technical questions from company A, there aren't just two people (me and you) in company B. Company A did understand, so I think we won't change the way we've been doing this up until now, and continue to do so hereafter. I have one question. Was the one who replied that making things directly would make it more quick company C?
Of course I think that, timewise, that would be more quick, but I think the main reason why replies are slow is that company C's replies are late and there are many times when company B (that is us) cannot reply. I've explained how, as for technical questions from company A, there aren't just two people (me and you) in company B. Company A did understand, so I think we won't change the way we've been doing this up until now, and continue to do so hereafter. I have one question. Was the one who replied that making things directly would make it more quick company C?
評価
57
翻訳 / 英語
- 2011/02/09 12:50:27に投稿されました
Company A seem to think the response will come faster if they ask company C directly.
Certainly, it is faster in terms of time. The reason why we (company B) can't respond soon is that company C responds late. I explained to A that only two of us are involved in technical questions. They understood, and they will do the same way in the future. I have a question. Did company C say that the respond will come faster if we ask directly?
Certainly, it is faster in terms of time. The reason why we (company B) can't respond soon is that company C responds late. I explained to A that only two of us are involved in technical questions. They understood, and they will do the same way in the future. I have a question. Did company C say that the respond will come faster if we ask directly?
