A社は添付の比較データを参照しました。
A社は次のように言っています：
機器X（バージョン１とバージョン２）に関しては、スケーリングについて妥当性があると言える。
しかし機器Yに関しては、バージョン１とバージョン２でQSの値に差異がある。
機器Y（バージョン１）を用いた試験を型式承認のためのベースモデルとして使用することについて、私たちはA社に対して納得のいく説明をしなければなりません。
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 25 Aug 2021 at 13:50
A firm referred the attached data comparison.
A firm say as such:
As for the device X (version 1 and 2), it can be appropriate as for its scaling.
However, as for device Y, there is a difference between version 1 and 2 by OS.
To use as a base model to prove model in the test using device Y (version 1), we, to A firm, must do enough explanation.
A firm say as such:
As for the device X (version 1 and 2), it can be appropriate as for its scaling.
However, as for device Y, there is a difference between version 1 and 2 by OS.
To use as a base model to prove model in the test using device Y (version 1), we, to A firm, must do enough explanation.
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 25 Aug 2021 at 13:49
Company A referred to the attached comparison data.
Company A says the following:
For device X (version 1 and version 2), we can say that there is validity about scaling.
However, for device Y, there is a difference in QS values between version 1 and version 2.
We have to give a convincing explanation to Company A about using the tests with Instrument Y (version 1) as the base model for type approval.
Company A says the following:
For device X (version 1 and version 2), we can say that there is validity about scaling.
However, for device Y, there is a difference in QS values between version 1 and version 2.
We have to give a convincing explanation to Company A about using the tests with Instrument Y (version 1) as the base model for type approval.
Rating
52
Translation / English
- Posted at 25 Aug 2021 at 13:49
A company has referred to the comparison data attached.
A company has stated as follows;
As for equipment X of version 1 and 2, it says there is an adequateness for scaling.
However, for equipment Y, there is a discrepancy in the value of QS between version 1 and 2.
Using equipment Y of version 1 in order to obtain the type approval for the experiment, we need to give a convincing explanation for A company.
A company has stated as follows;
As for equipment X of version 1 and 2, it says there is an adequateness for scaling.
However, for equipment Y, there is a discrepancy in the value of QS between version 1 and 2.
Using equipment Y of version 1 in order to obtain the type approval for the experiment, we need to give a convincing explanation for A company.
