[Translation from Japanese to English ] I think I misunderstood the behavior of "fugo". In this particular case, it ...

Additional info

"hoge","fugo","bar"は伏せ字です．ソースコードはプログラム，オーバーライドはそのまま"override"と翻訳していただいて構いません．

Original text

"fugo" の挙動について少し勘違いをしていたようでした．
このケースにおいては "hoge" の記述をしても期待する結果を得られそうです．

"fugo" と "hoge" を混在させていることがそもそもナンセンスでした．

ソースコード上では"hoge"は"bar"として解釈されていることを確認しました．
# "hoge"は"bar"をオーバーライドしているということを理解しました．

上記の理解で正しいでしょうか？

Translation / English

I think I misunderstood the behavior of "fugo".
In this particular case, it seems that we can also get expected result by the description of "hoge".

As a matter of fact, it does have no meaning that we mixed up "fugo" and "hoge" together.

I have confirmed that "hoge" is interpreted a "bar" in the source code/
# I understood that "hoge" overrides "bar".

Is my understanding mentioned above right?

Translation / English

It looks like I had misunderstood about movement of "fugo" a little bit.
For this case, even with a description of "hoge" will bring expected result.

After all, it was nonsense to mix up "fugo" and "hoge".

I confirmed that "hoge" was interpreted as "bar" on source code.
I understood that # "hoge" overrides "bar".

Is my above understanding correct?

Translation / English

I seem to have misunderstood the action of "fugo".
It is likely that a description of "hoge" on this case will help us gain some expecting results.

It was totally nonsense to have mixed with "fugo" and "hoge" in the first place.

I confirmed that "hoge" was interpreted as "bar " on the program.
I have also confiemd that # "hoge" is overriding "bar".

Am I right with my understanding above?