つまり、3種類の内、EPA+が使用できるのは1種類だけです。
そして、PPでもグレードの異なる3種類の原料で同じ実験をしましたが、物性の変化がなかったのは1種類だけでした。
EPA+をクライアント企業に販売する際、この事実は大変重要です。
あなたはこの原因がわかりますか?
原料メーカーに、この2種類の原料の違いを問い合わせましたが、””MFRの違い””としか回答しません。
EPA+を使用しても物性の変化が無い原料を探す方法を教えて下さい。
Translation / English
- Posted at 13 Apr 2022 at 02:55
In other words, only one of the three types can use EPA+.
The same experiment was conducted in PP with three types of raw materials of different grades. One type did not change its physical properties.
This fact is very important when selling EPA+ to client companies.
Would you happen to know the cause of this?
I asked the raw material manufacturer about the difference between these two types of raw materials, but they merely replied, 'The MFR is different'.
If known, please let me know how to find a raw material that does not change its physical properties even when EPA+ is used.
he-he-he-chan likes this translation
The same experiment was conducted in PP with three types of raw materials of different grades. One type did not change its physical properties.
This fact is very important when selling EPA+ to client companies.
Would you happen to know the cause of this?
I asked the raw material manufacturer about the difference between these two types of raw materials, but they merely replied, 'The MFR is different'.
If known, please let me know how to find a raw material that does not change its physical properties even when EPA+ is used.
Translation / English
- Posted at 13 Apr 2022 at 03:46
That is, only one type of the EPA+ (eicosapentaenoic acid+) can be used in the group of the three types.
In addition, we made the same experiment using the materials of three different grades of PP (Peyer’s patch), but only one of these demonstrated a change in the physical property.
When you sell EPA+ to the client company, this fact is critically important.
Can you see the cause of this phenomenon?
When we inquired the difference between these two types of materials from the raw material maker, they did not answer that it was the “difference of the MFR (myocardial flow reserve)”.
Please instruct me about the way to find the material which shows no changes in the physical property when EPA+ is used.
he-he-he-chan likes this translation
In addition, we made the same experiment using the materials of three different grades of PP (Peyer’s patch), but only one of these demonstrated a change in the physical property.
When you sell EPA+ to the client company, this fact is critically important.
Can you see the cause of this phenomenon?
When we inquired the difference between these two types of materials from the raw material maker, they did not answer that it was the “difference of the MFR (myocardial flow reserve)”.
Please instruct me about the way to find the material which shows no changes in the physical property when EPA+ is used.
Translation / English
- Posted at 13 Apr 2022 at 03:06
So, only 1 within the 3 can use the EPA+.
Furthermore, the same experiment was done with 3 other types of ingredients which the PP differ, but only 1 of them had a change in measure.
When selling EPA+ to clients, this fact is extremely important.
Can you tell the cause of this result?
We have asked the difference of the 2 ingredients to the manufactures, but they only gave us a answer that "the MFR differ".
Please support us with ideas to find ingredients that are not effected by EPA+ use.
he-he-he-chan likes this translation
Furthermore, the same experiment was done with 3 other types of ingredients which the PP differ, but only 1 of them had a change in measure.
When selling EPA+ to clients, this fact is extremely important.
Can you tell the cause of this result?
We have asked the difference of the 2 ingredients to the manufactures, but they only gave us a answer that "the MFR differ".
Please support us with ideas to find ingredients that are not effected by EPA+ use.