貴社コメントに対し、エンジニアからのコメントを回答致します。
lossが4% から 3%に減っても恐らく大丈夫ですが、
確証は出来ません。
lossが3%で洗浄ができなかった時に、設備は使い物にならないので、
やはり４％、５％、６％と増やせる設備にすべきだと考えます。
「３％しか絶対出来ない」というなら設備が機能しない可能性があるため、
今回は辞退させていただくしかありません。
今回特殊な設計かと思いますが、すでに他社さんとテスト等を行っているのでしょうか。
Rating
53
Translation / English
- Posted at 14 Jul 2021 at 09:42
This is to reply from our engineer to your comment.
It would be alright if loss rate decreases from 4% to 3%.
Please note that this is not guaranteed.
If loss rate is 3% and the facility cannot be cleaned, the facility could be no longer usable.
Therefore, we think that the facility should have potential for 4%, 5% and 6%.
If you insist on 3%, we have to withdraw from this project because of a possibility of the facility's failure to function.
This seems to be a special engineering design. Have you already performed tests with other companies?
It would be alright if loss rate decreases from 4% to 3%.
Please note that this is not guaranteed.
If loss rate is 3% and the facility cannot be cleaned, the facility could be no longer usable.
Therefore, we think that the facility should have potential for 4%, 5% and 6%.
If you insist on 3%, we have to withdraw from this project because of a possibility of the facility's failure to function.
This seems to be a special engineering design. Have you already performed tests with other companies?
![[deleted user]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
Rating
52
Translation / English
- Posted at 14 Jul 2021 at 09:29
I would like to share an answer from our engineer for your comment.
We are not assured that it will be alright if the loss would drop from 4% to 3%.
If the loss reaches 3% for not performing a cleaning, the system makes no use so that the system should be upgraded to be able to increase to 4, 5, and 6%.
When you might say that you can only make it 3%, there might be a possibility to perform a function, so we would like to decline at this time.
Although it seems that it is a specific design, do you conduct a test with others?
We are not assured that it will be alright if the loss would drop from 4% to 3%.
If the loss reaches 3% for not performing a cleaning, the system makes no use so that the system should be upgraded to be able to increase to 4, 5, and 6%.
When you might say that you can only make it 3%, there might be a possibility to perform a function, so we would like to decline at this time.
Although it seems that it is a specific design, do you conduct a test with others?
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 14 Jul 2021 at 09:48
This is the comment from our engineer on your comment.
It will probably be fine although loss decreases from 4% to 3% but it cannot be confirmed.
If cleaning is not successful at 3% loss, the facility is not useful. Given that, we think that the facility should be capable of increasing 4, 5 and 6%.
If 3% is the only choice you have, we would like to decline this time because the facility may not be likely to work.
We presume that this design specification is special. Have you ever tested with other customers?
It will probably be fine although loss decreases from 4% to 3% but it cannot be confirmed.
If cleaning is not successful at 3% loss, the facility is not useful. Given that, we think that the facility should be capable of increasing 4, 5 and 6%.
If 3% is the only choice you have, we would like to decline this time because the facility may not be likely to work.
We presume that this design specification is special. Have you ever tested with other customers?
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 14 Jul 2021 at 09:39
Here is a comment from our engineer in response to your comment.
It should be okay if the loss rate drops from 4 to 3 %, but it is not 100% for sure.
The equipment would become useless in the event where the loss could not be washed at 3%, so we believe the equipment should be capable to increase the rate like 4, 5 and to 6%.
If "3% is the one and only option", we have no choice but rejecting the offer because there is a chance that the equipment would not fully function.
I believe it is a special design, have you already performed a verification testing, etc. with other companies?
It should be okay if the loss rate drops from 4 to 3 %, but it is not 100% for sure.
The equipment would become useless in the event where the loss could not be washed at 3%, so we believe the equipment should be capable to increase the rate like 4, 5 and to 6%.
If "3% is the one and only option", we have no choice but rejecting the offer because there is a chance that the equipment would not fully function.
I believe it is a special design, have you already performed a verification testing, etc. with other companies?
Rating
44
Translation / English
- Posted at 14 Jul 2021 at 09:51
for your coment, I receive engineer's coment.
loss is all right but we will not convince.
loss is 3%, facilities is not used, like 4% 5% 6% I think that .
3％ is completed
this time I resign.
this time specific design, already you take a test and so on.
loss is all right but we will not convince.
loss is 3%, facilities is not used, like 4% 5% 6% I think that .
3％ is completed
this time I resign.
this time specific design, already you take a test and so on.
