[Translation from Japanese to English ] I understand that A setting is effective when designating C function. For ...

Original text

A設定はC機能を指定する時に効果的な設定だと理解しています。

例えば，最初はC機能を指定しないで全てのデータを収集し，2回目以降はA設定を使いC機能の値に1を指定するとディレクトリの1階層目のみが更新対象になり，収集されない2階層目以降はインデックスから削除されないという認識です。

ところが実際に上記の設定で処理を実行してみると2回目以降の処理で，2階層目のドキュメントが
インデックスから削除されてしまいます。これはB設定にした時も同様です。

私の認識が間違っているのでしょうか？

Translation / English

I understand that A setting is effective when designating C function.

For example, I understand that firstly it collects all data without designating C function, and after second time, when designating value of 1 as C function using A setting, only the first layer on directory will be subject to updating, and after 2nd layer which will not be collected will not be deleted from index.

However, when actually processing as the above setting, document on 2nd layer is deleted from index when processing 2nd time and after that. It works same way when using setting B.

Is there anything wrong with my understanding?

Translation / English

I understand that the A setting is an effective setting when specifying the C function.

For example, collect all data without specifying the C function at first, and if the second and subsequent times use the A setting and specify 1 for the value of the C function, only the first level of the directory will be updated, and two levels will not be collected It is the recognition that it will not be deleted from the index after the first.

But, if you execute the process with the above settings, the document in the second layer will be displayed in the second and subsequent processes.
It will be deleted from the index. The same applies when the B setting is selected.

Is my perception wrong?

Translation / English

I understand that Setting A is effective when Function C is defined.

For example, if I put 1 in the value of Function C with Setting A after retrieving all data without defining Function C, only the first layer of the directory will be updated and the second and deeper layers, which are not retrieved, will not be deleted from the index.

However, when I actually executed above, documents in the second layer was deleted from the index. This also happened with Setting B.

Can you please confirm if my understanding above is correct?