[Translation from Japanese to English ] I received a warning of intellectual property right from Amazon today. I hav...

Original text

私は今日、amazonから知的財産権の警告を受けた。
貴方の依頼人の知的財産権を私は侵害していた。
大変申し訳ありません。
しかし私はこの違反の内容がわからない。
なぜならメーカーが複数に渡って、商品の種類も二つに渡っているからです。
警告を受けた商品のメーカーはOSK、つぶまる麦茶、西出製茶場、日薬壮健の４つです。
商品の種類は麦茶と緑茶の二つです。

貴方の依頼人の持っている知的財産権はメーカーに由来するものですか？
それとも、「麦茶」「緑茶」の商品カテゴリに由来するものですか？

Translation / English

I received a warning of intellectual property right from Amazon today.
I have violated the intellectual property right of a person who requested at your side.
I deeply apologize to you.
But I do not understand this violation well.
The reason is that there are several manufacturers and 2 types of item.
The manufacturers about whose item I received the warning are OSK, Tsubumaru-Mugicha, Nishide-Seichaba and Nichiyaku-Soken.
The types of the item are mugicha and green tea.

Is the intellectual property right that the person who requested at your side derived from the manufacturer?
Or is it derived from category of the item "mugicha" and "green tea"?

Translation / English

I received a warning regarding the infringement of the intellectual property.
I infringed the intellectual property of your client.
I am very sorry about that.
However, I cannot understand the details of this infringement.
This is because the concerned manufacturers are two, and the items can be categorized into two.
The manufacturers of the items which relate with the warning are four, which are OSK, Tsubumaru Mugicha, Nishide Seichajo and Nichiyaku Soken.
The categories of the items are the barley tea and the green tea.

Does the intellectual property of your client come from the ,manufacturer?
Or, does it come from the categories of the item, "barley tea" and "green tea"?

Translation / English

Today I received a warning of intellectual property right from amazon.
Your client's intellectual property right was infringed by me.
I am very sorry.
But I do not understand the contents of this infringement.
Because the manufacturer went over about two type of products.
The article that received the warning was OSK from the manufacturer, the Tsubu Maru barley tea, the tea processing Nishide, the fourth healthy Nichiyaku.
The products types are barley tea and green tea.
Does your client's intellectual property right is based on the manufacturer?.
Or are they based on the products category "barley tea", "green tea"?

Original text

それともお茶類全般に知的財産権を保有しているのでしょうか？

私は意図的に知財権の違反を犯したわけではなく、普段は正当な権利を侵害しないように努めている。
だから私は、無意識に違反してしまったその内容を知りたいです。
どうか私にアドバイスを下さい。

Translation / English

Or do you possess the intellectual property right of the tea in whole?

I have not intended to violate the intellectual property right.
I usually try not to violate a right.
For this reason, I would like to know details of why I had violated it unconsciously.
Would you please advise me?

Translation / English

Or, does your client have the intellectual property on the whole tea category comprehensively?

I did not infringe the intellectual property intentionally. I always try not to infringe the valid right.
So, I would like to know the detail of the infringement unintentionally.
Please give me your suggestion.