このように、用語によって背景因子に差があることがわかります。ある用語はAというバックグラウンドがある報告がほとんど、またある用語はBといった感じです。この傾向は、地域や人種によって違うのではないかとも思います。背景因子に関わらず××という事象の報告に用いられる用語を狭域検索、背景因子によって偏りがあるものを広域検索？とかも考えましたが、確実に××という事象を拾い上げるための狭域検索とは違ってきてしまうので、あまり良いアイデアではないかも知れません。
評価
60
翻訳 / 英語
- 2015/09/19 14:49:12に投稿されました
Thus, you can see that there is a difference in background factor by terminologies. One terminology has reports almost all with A background and some has reports almost all with B background. This tendency may differ depending on regions and races. I originally thought that narrow search, regardless of background factors, is suitable for terminologies used in an event report of xx, and broad search is suitable for terminologies biased by background factors. But this broad search may not be a good idea because it becomes different from narrow search for definitely picking up xx events.
johmamaさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2015/09/19 14:43:31に投稿されました
As mentioned, each word has different background factors. A certain word has reports of mostly having background A. And other word background B and so on. This tendency may differ depend on the regions or races. I once considered that those words reporting event xx should be use narrowed search regardless of their background factors and that those that has some deviation depending on the background factors should use wide range search. But the results came out to be different from those to pick up event XX thoroghtly so this may not be such a good idea.
johmamaさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2015/09/19 14:58:19に投稿されました
This way, I understand that each word has a deference in the background factors. One word mostly has A back ground and another has B, and so on. This trend seems deferent depending on regions and peoples. Though I thought, regardless of back ground factors, the word used for reporting of incidents as xx is narrow search, and the word that has a disparity depending on back ground factor is wide search?.As it makes difference the wide research to pick reporting of incidents for sure as it is called xx, the idea may not be a good one.
johmamaさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
評価
61
ネイティブ
翻訳 / 英語
- 2015/09/19 15:42:39に投稿されました
In this sense, one is able to differentiate background factors depending on terminology. A certain term mostly implies background A, while a different term implies background B. I think that this tendency to associate certain meaning to words differs based on region and racial background. I have thought about things like small-scale research on terminology that possesses the implication of phenomenon XX regardless of background factors, and also broad-scale research on ones that have bias, taking background factors into consideration. However, I am not certain that this is a good idea because, small-scale research that reliably picks up on phenomenon XX would end up becoming distorted.
johmamaさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2015/09/19 15:03:44に投稿されました
In this way, you will see the difference in the background factors depending on the terms.
For example, a term is mostly reported in the background of A, and another term is mostly reported in the background of B. This trend seems to be different depending on region and race. I thought I should search in the narrow area for the terms that are used in the report of "something such an event regardless of background factor" or otherwise in the widen area for the terms "having deviations of background factor".
However, they might not be very good idea since it is not the narrow area search for picking up an event of something being doubtless.
johmamaさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
For example, a term is mostly reported in the background of A, and another term is mostly reported in the background of B. This trend seems to be different depending on region and race. I thought I should search in the narrow area for the terms that are used in the report of "something such an event regardless of background factor" or otherwise in the widen area for the terms "having deviations of background factor".
However, they might not be very good idea since it is not the narrow area search for picking up an event of something being doubtless.
用語の英訳はwordよりもterminologyがより適切であること、また本文に書かれたterminologyと事象と背景因子の関係を少し正確に表現できるように、上記全文を下記に訂正させてください。
As mentioned, you will notice that there are difference in background factors in each terminology. For example, one certain terminology reports having mostly backgroud A and another terminology having mostly background B and so on. This tendency may differ depend on the regions or races. I once considered to search all terminology reporting event XX that is not relating to any background factor by using a search with narrowed area and also those terminology that shows some deviation depending on the background factor by using wide range search. But as this search results would differ from those with narrowed area search aming to pick up terminology covering events XX throughly this may not be a good idea.