小児の神経や筋肉は未発達で、成人とは異なると思うのですが、XXPの値は成人と比べ、その信頼度はどうなのでしょうか？
もう一点、非常に基本的な質問になりますが、XXPのカタログで、眼輪筋測定を紹介しているモデルが子供の写真になっています。これは、なぜでしょうか？小児の場合、小指の筋肉より眼輪筋を使用するほうが信頼性がたかいのでしょうか？
非常に基本的な質問で申し訳ございません。
お忙しい中申し訳ありませんが、教えていただければ大変嬉しく思います。
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 23 May 2012 at 00:20
I think the nerve and muscle of children are different from those of adults; they are not matured. Then, how is the reliability of the XXP values for children compared to those of adults?
One more basic question:
In your brochure of XXP, a child is the model for the object of the orbicularis oculi muscle test. I wonder why?. The orbicularis oculi muscle test is more reliable fore children than minims muscle test?
I apologize for my very primitive questions, but I will appreciate your kind suggestion.
I am sorry to bother you.
One more basic question:
In your brochure of XXP, a child is the model for the object of the orbicularis oculi muscle test. I wonder why?. The orbicularis oculi muscle test is more reliable fore children than minims muscle test?
I apologize for my very primitive questions, but I will appreciate your kind suggestion.
I am sorry to bother you.
Rating
62
Translation / English
- Posted at 22 May 2012 at 20:05
A young child's nervous system and muscles are undeveloped and different from an adult's. How credible is the value of XXP for a child compared to an adult?
Another basic question: in the catalog for XXP, the model to recommend the measurement of the orbicularis oculi muscle has been changed to the photo of a child. Why is that so? Is it because for young children, it is more credible to use the orbicularis oculi muscle rather than the muscles in the last finger?
I'm very sorry for these very basic questions.
I apologize again for bothering you with these questions, but I hope you can help me with them.
Another basic question: in the catalog for XXP, the model to recommend the measurement of the orbicularis oculi muscle has been changed to the photo of a child. Why is that so? Is it because for young children, it is more credible to use the orbicularis oculi muscle rather than the muscles in the last finger?
I'm very sorry for these very basic questions.
I apologize again for bothering you with these questions, but I hope you can help me with them.
Rating
68
Native
Translation / English
- Posted at 23 May 2012 at 01:13
Children's nerves and muscles are undeveloped and adults differ, but compared with an adult how is the reliability of XXP's value?
Another point--and this is an extremely basic question--but, in the XXP catalog, there's a child's photograph for the model introducing the orbicularis oculi muscle. Why is this? Is it because for children it's more reliable to use the orbicularis oculi muscle than a pinky finger muscle?
I'm sorry for asking such a basic question.
I'm sorry for bothering you but I'd really appreciate it if you could answer these for me.
Another point--and this is an extremely basic question--but, in the XXP catalog, there's a child's photograph for the model introducing the orbicularis oculi muscle. Why is this? Is it because for children it's more reliable to use the orbicularis oculi muscle than a pinky finger muscle?
I'm sorry for asking such a basic question.
I'm sorry for bothering you but I'd really appreciate it if you could answer these for me.
