[Translation from Japanese to English ] As for fee of P, it might be different from the explanation you had when you ...

Original text

P費用について、こちらへ来られた際の説明と若干齟齬があるかもしれず申し訳ありませんが、
こちらでPに関する費用を改めて確認したところ、BにP費用は含まれていませんでした。
Pが含まれているのはCのみで、米国用の計算結果には含まず日本用のみ織り込んでいます。
Aを添付しますが、これを見ればCを理解できると思います。
またLルールについて、本企画実施と同時点の9月に更新されたため旧ルールで計算しています。
投資計算のロジックは頂いた表で正しいですが、念の為再確認し明日再度お返事します。

Translation / English

As for fee of P, it might be different from the explanation you had when you came here a little. I hate to say, but I checked the fee of P again and found that the fee of P was not included in B.
P is included only in C. It is not included in calculation result for the States, and it included only for Japanese one.
I attach A. You will understand C if you check it.
As for L rule, it is calculated by old rule since it was updated in September when this plan was carried out. Regarding logic of calculation of investment, I will check it again for reference and let you know again tomorrow.

Translation / English

For the P fee, as there will be slight difference between its explanation and reality when you come here, when we checked newly about the fee for P, there is no B fees in the P.
In C only, P is included. The US calculation result is not included but for Japanese only.
As I will attach A, you can understand it.
Also as for the L rule, it is calculated with old rule as it was updated at the same time with this plan in September.
Although stock calculation logic is right with given one, I would like to check it again and will reply about it tomorrow to you.

Translation / English

Regarding the expense for P, I am sorry that there might have been differences when in explanation a bit here, just after confirming the expenses for P happened here once again, B wasn't included in the expense for P.
Inclusion for P is just only C, it isn't including for the calculation result for the US market, but for that of Japan.
As I attach A, Once you see, you can easily understand C.
And on the L rule, it is calculated by former rule because it was changed in the past September at this time along with implementing this planning.
As the logic for calculation for investment is correct corresponding with given chart, let me check and will be replying back you shortly tomorrow

Translation / English

For P cost, sorry not may be a discrepancy slightly from the description of the time you came here. After confirmed the costs once again related to P, P costs were not included in the B. Only C is of P is included, we incorporate only for Japan not included in the calculation result for the United States. Attach the A, but I think that I can understand the C if you look at it. Also for L rule, it has been calculated by the old rules because it was updated in September of this project carried out at the same time. Logic of investment calculation is correct in the table that we receive, but reaffirmed just to make sure you answer again tomorrow