確認させてもらいたいのですが、AAによりA社でなくC社に責任が生じるのは、AAが有効である期間に限られるのでしょうか？我々が懸念しているのは、C社が活動を終え、AAが終了した後に、過去のC社の活動が原因となって環境問題等が生じる場合です。ご存知だと思いますが、環境問題は時間が経ってから生じる場合があります。このような場合にもA社が責任を負わないような方法はありますか？
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/06/05 16:38:21に投稿されました
Please allow me to check, due to AA, does C corporation owes the responsibility instead of A corporation only for a limited duration while AA is valid? Our concern is, after C corporation has completed its activity and AA is finished, an environmental issue arises due to C corporation's past activities. As you know, environmental issues often arises after a while. In this scenario, is there anyway A corporation could evade its responsibility?
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/06/05 16:38:16に投稿されました
I would like to clarify regarding AA in which it states that C is responsible in stead of A, It this condition only applies for the period when AA is valid?
Our concern is the case when ecological issue arises due to C's act after C completed AA, As you may be already aware, ecological issue will arises a long time after its causes. In such a case, is there any way to protect A from being responsible?
Our concern is the case when ecological issue arises due to C's act after C completed AA, As you may be already aware, ecological issue will arises a long time after its causes. In such a case, is there any way to protect A from being responsible?
★★★★★ 5.0/1
![[削除済みユーザ]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/06/05 16:38:42に投稿されました
I would like to make confirmation. Is it limited to the valid period of AA that C company but not A company is accountable under the AA.
What we concern is that the environmental issues resulting from the past activities of C company after completing their portion and AA is expired.
As you might know, the environmental issues may be arisen after elapsing certain times. Is there any way that the A company will not be liable for even such situation will be arisen?
What we concern is that the environmental issues resulting from the past activities of C company after completing their portion and AA is expired.
As you might know, the environmental issues may be arisen after elapsing certain times. Is there any way that the A company will not be liable for even such situation will be arisen?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/06/05 16:44:39に投稿されました
I want to confirm. Is reason of the fact that AA makes not A but C be responsible is that effective period of AA is limited?
We are concerned about the case where C's activity in the past causes a problem of environment etc. after C completes the activity and AA finishes it.
As you know, an environmental problem sometimes occurs long after it. In such a case, do we have a way that A is not responsible for?
We are concerned about the case where C's activity in the past causes a problem of environment etc. after C completes the activity and AA finishes it.
As you know, an environmental problem sometimes occurs long after it. In such a case, do we have a way that A is not responsible for?
