このレターは確かにBに関するレターです。
ですが、Aのインフォメーション欄にチェックが付けられています。
Bに関するドキュメントだったとしても、関連するサブシステムにインフォメーションとして配布される場合があります。
（参考例として添付の過去のレターをご欄ください。）
ですので、Aとして受領しているものと私は理解しているので、受領番号が必要だと考えた次第です。
![[削除済みユーザ]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2013/06/03 17:13:42に投稿されました
It is sure this letter is related to B but it has check mark in the information box related to A.
By this way, this document may be distributed to a sub-system as information even though this document is related B. (Please find an attached old letter for your reference)
Therefore, I thought there should be received number as I understood this was received as A.
By this way, this document may be distributed to a sub-system as information even though this document is related B. (Please find an attached old letter for your reference)
Therefore, I thought there should be received number as I understood this was received as A.
評価
57
翻訳 / 英語
- 2013/06/03 17:08:07に投稿されました
This letter is surely about B.
However, there is a check in the information section of A.
Even if it is a document about B, there is a case in which it is given out as information to the sub-systems concerned.
(Please refer to the attached past letters as examples.)
Therefore, I recognize that it is accepted as A, and that it needs a receipt number.
However, there is a check in the information section of A.
Even if it is a document about B, there is a case in which it is given out as information to the sub-systems concerned.
(Please refer to the attached past letters as examples.)
Therefore, I recognize that it is accepted as A, and that it needs a receipt number.
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2013/06/03 17:08:00に投稿されました
This letter is about B.
But, I found that the information of A was checked also.
Because it is the document for B, there might be relative information distributed to the subsystem .
(Refer to the letter of the past attached as a reference example.)
So, I think it is OK to receive it as A, and there is need for receipt number.
But, I found that the information of A was checked also.
Because it is the document for B, there might be relative information distributed to the subsystem .
(Refer to the letter of the past attached as a reference example.)
So, I think it is OK to receive it as A, and there is need for receipt number.
