商品をまだ発送して頂けないのですか？もう●日経過しています。
先日、「●」にて商品の発送依頼をしました。
11月7日に商品が届きましたが、箱にはDHLの記載がありました。
「●」と依頼したのにDHLの記載がある箱が来るのは何故でしょうか？
案の定、中の商品の一つは破損していました。
先日、DHLでの配送で商品が壊れた以来、私は「●」を利用していました。
事実「●」では破損がありませんでした。
「●」というのは虚偽でしょうか？「●」というならば、初めから「●」を使用して下さい！
評価
63
翻訳 / 英語
- 2012/11/07 21:40:54に投稿されました
Didn't you ship the package yet? ●days have already passed.
I asked to ship the package at 「●」the other day.
I receive it on November 7 and the box had DHL label.
I specifically ordered 「●」and why do I receive it in a DHL box?
Naturally one of the items in the package was broken.
I've been using 「●」since I experienced a damage of an item with DHL shipment.
And for the fact my items always arrived safe with 「●」.
Did you lie to me when you mentioned 「●」? When you say you use 「●」, you use 「●」!
I asked to ship the package at 「●」the other day.
I receive it on November 7 and the box had DHL label.
I specifically ordered 「●」and why do I receive it in a DHL box?
Naturally one of the items in the package was broken.
I've been using 「●」since I experienced a damage of an item with DHL shipment.
And for the fact my items always arrived safe with 「●」.
Did you lie to me when you mentioned 「●」? When you say you use 「●」, you use 「●」!
★★★☆☆ 3.2/2
![[削除済みユーザ]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
評価
72
翻訳 / 英語
- 2012/11/07 21:40:45に投稿されました
Have you sent the product yet? ● days have already passed
The other day, I requested 「●」 for the shipping of the product.
The product arrived on November 7, but inside the box there was a DHL statement.
I requested 「●」, so why is it that the box comes with a DHL statement?
As usual, one of the products inside was damaged.
The other day, since one of the products shipped by DHL was broken, I used 「●」.
In reality, there was no damage with 「●」.
Is it not true that is called 「●」? If it is 「●」, please use 「●」 in the first place!
The other day, I requested 「●」 for the shipping of the product.
The product arrived on November 7, but inside the box there was a DHL statement.
I requested 「●」, so why is it that the box comes with a DHL statement?
As usual, one of the products inside was damaged.
The other day, since one of the products shipped by DHL was broken, I used 「●」.
In reality, there was no damage with 「●」.
Is it not true that is called 「●」? If it is 「●」, please use 「●」 in the first place!
★★★☆☆ 3.2/2
評価
59
翻訳 / 英語
- 2012/11/07 21:43:52に投稿されました
Are the products still not delivered yet? It has already been ● days.
Days before, I have requested for the delivery of the products by "●"
The products arrived on 7th November, however the box was labelled with DHL.
I have request for the delivery by "●" and why a box of DHL has arrived instead?
As expected, one of the products was damaged.
I have been always using "●" for delivery since the last time I have got a damaged product delivered by DHL.
In fact, there was no damaged caused when delivered by "●" ever.
"●" is just a false claim? If it is "●", please use "●" from the very beginning!
Days before, I have requested for the delivery of the products by "●"
The products arrived on 7th November, however the box was labelled with DHL.
I have request for the delivery by "●" and why a box of DHL has arrived instead?
As expected, one of the products was damaged.
I have been always using "●" for delivery since the last time I have got a damaged product delivered by DHL.
In fact, there was no damaged caused when delivered by "●" ever.
"●" is just a false claim? If it is "●", please use "●" from the very beginning!
★★☆☆☆ 2.4/1
評価
44
翻訳 / 英語
- 2012/11/07 21:51:58に投稿されました
Have you already shipped the products? ● days have already passed.
The other day, I requested for ● product to be shipped.
The product has arrived on November 11th and "DHL" was indicated on the box.
Why is there a "DHL" description on the box for the ● product that I ordered?
As usual, one of the products inside is damaged.
Just recently, since the products shipped through DHL were broken, I have been using ● instead.
Actually, there were no damages when I shipped through ●.
Is it false to say ●? If you say ●, please say "Use ● from the beginning" then!
The other day, I requested for ● product to be shipped.
The product has arrived on November 11th and "DHL" was indicated on the box.
Why is there a "DHL" description on the box for the ● product that I ordered?
As usual, one of the products inside is damaged.
Just recently, since the products shipped through DHL were broken, I have been using ● instead.
Actually, there were no damages when I shipped through ●.
Is it false to say ●? If you say ●, please say "Use ● from the beginning" then!
評価
45
翻訳 / 英語
- 2012/11/07 21:47:07に投稿されました
Is the products still not yet post out? It's been●days past.
The other day,i have made a request of sending the product of 「●」
The Item has arrived on November 7, there was a description record of DHL inside the box.
I request the 「●」but why is it come with a DHL box with description ?
Im Sure enough, one of the products had been damaged.
Since recently,the delivered goods by DHL were destroyed i am using the "●" .
The fact is, by using 「●」there is no any damage.
Is 「●」a falsehood? if it is 「●」, please use 「●」in the begining.
The other day,i have made a request of sending the product of 「●」
The Item has arrived on November 7, there was a description record of DHL inside the box.
I request the 「●」but why is it come with a DHL box with description ?
Im Sure enough, one of the products had been damaged.
Since recently,the delivered goods by DHL were destroyed i am using the "●" .
The fact is, by using 「●」there is no any damage.
Is 「●」a falsehood? if it is 「●」, please use 「●」in the begining.
★★★☆☆ 3.2/2
