御社にとって理想的なパートナーの条件は何ですか?
一つの商圏(Amazon)内でお客を奪い合い、お互いを攻撃し合う状況はメーカーとしてどう思いますか?
一つの商圏で同じ商品のシェアを奪い合うことだけを考えている販売者と、中長期の視点からプロモーションを積極的に行って多数の商圏(ECサイト全般、実店舗を構える全国のサイクルショップ)へ進出し新たなマーケットを開拓していく販売者がどちらが御社にとって長期的な利益をもたらしますか?
翻訳 / 英語
- 2019/03/13 10:54:41に投稿されました
What are the requirements of an ideal partner for your company?
What do you think as a manufacturer about the current status of fighting for customers in one marketplace (Amazon) and attacking one other?
For your company, what kind of seller would bring about profit in the long term? Sellers who think only of fighting for the same product market share in one marketplace or sellers who actively carry out promotions from a mid-term point of view, progresses in multiple market places (EC sites in general, cycle shops all over the country which set up actual brick-and-mortar stores) and continues to break ground in new marketplaces?
What do you think as a manufacturer about the current status of fighting for customers in one marketplace (Amazon) and attacking one other?
For your company, what kind of seller would bring about profit in the long term? Sellers who think only of fighting for the same product market share in one marketplace or sellers who actively carry out promotions from a mid-term point of view, progresses in multiple market places (EC sites in general, cycle shops all over the country which set up actual brick-and-mortar stores) and continues to break ground in new marketplaces?
翻訳 / 英語
- 2019/03/13 10:54:08に投稿されました
What is the condition as your ideal partner?
What do you think of the situation that companies vie for the customers in a market (Amazon) and attack each other?
Which seller will bring the long term benefit for you, that think only grab the market share of the same item from others in a market, or actively promote from the point of view in mid-long term to penetrate many markets (the whole EC site, cycle shops that have the actual stores in nationwide) to develop new market?
What do you think of the situation that companies vie for the customers in a market (Amazon) and attack each other?
Which seller will bring the long term benefit for you, that think only grab the market share of the same item from others in a market, or actively promote from the point of view in mid-long term to penetrate many markets (the whole EC site, cycle shops that have the actual stores in nationwide) to develop new market?
翻訳 / 英語
- 2019/03/13 10:55:12に投稿されました
What are your company's ideal partners conditions?
In one Amazon area, what do you think of getting customers and attacking each other as a maker?
In one business area, which seller can benefit you in a long time to come by those sellers considering the same product shares and by those who actively promote, from a middle and long term point of view, actively to go new market by developing in the many business areas ( in the whole EC sites and store s of internal circle shops)?
In one Amazon area, what do you think of getting customers and attacking each other as a maker?
In one business area, which seller can benefit you in a long time to come by those sellers considering the same product shares and by those who actively promote, from a middle and long term point of view, actively to go new market by developing in the many business areas ( in the whole EC sites and store s of internal circle shops)?
翻訳 / 英語
- 2019/03/13 10:53:17に投稿されました
What is the condition for your ideal business partner?
What do you think of those makers who cannibalize customers within the one same business zone (Amazon) and attacking one another?
Those sellers who merely think of cannibalize the market share with a same product within the same market zone by actively performing promos from a mid-term viewpoint, and those others who launches their business to multiple marketing zones (overall EC sites, nationwide cycle shop that holds brick and mortal stores) and explore the new marketing horizons, which one would bring profit in a long run?
What do you think of those makers who cannibalize customers within the one same business zone (Amazon) and attacking one another?
Those sellers who merely think of cannibalize the market share with a same product within the same market zone by actively performing promos from a mid-term viewpoint, and those others who launches their business to multiple marketing zones (overall EC sites, nationwide cycle shop that holds brick and mortal stores) and explore the new marketing horizons, which one would bring profit in a long run?