Conyac で依頼された翻訳結果を公開

Although I think that X is effective to the distinction of benign and malignant, eventually, I think that the conclusion is not clear whether X is needed on the clinical from this thesis at all. There is no meaning of both of R and S, right? If imaging and review is not shown properly, the readers cannot understand that how this thesis is useful for the medical care in the future.
I think that it is not proper that only three theses are reviewed a lot of neoplasm together. I consider that the risk of bias is not avoided because there are many involvement of the other factors such as patient background, tumor properties, size, etc.
I cannot find contribution for oncology in the future about this thesis.