jetrans — Translations

ID Verified

Over 13 years ago Female 40s

India

Japanese English Hindi

A listing of the public translations that were written by this user. This listing does not include the requests that have yet to be completed.

Japanese → English 04 Jun 2011 at 01:22
Original Text 鶏と卵と友達鶏が先か、卵が先か？僕はパパに聞いてみたパパは少し考えてこう言ったおまえはニンジンが嫌いだよな？うんニンジンが好きな子と友達になれるかな？うん、なれるよおまえは野球が好きだよな？うん	Translation Chicken, egg and a friend Is chicken first or the egg? I asked this question to daddy. Daddy pondered for a while and said this way… You don’t like carrots, don’t you? Yes Can you be a friend with a child that likes carrots? Yes, I would Do you like baseball? Yes

Japanese → English 04 Jun 2011 at 01:43
Original Text サッカーが好きな子と友達になれるかな？うん、なれるよおまえは鶏と卵、どっちが先だと思う？うーん、分からないけど…卵だと思う卵の方が小さいからおまえは鶏が先だと思う子と友達になれるかな？え？うん、なれるよおまえは心の優しい子だパパはとてもうれしいよどっちが先？パパは教えてくれなかった	Translation Would you be a friend of a child who likes soccer? Yes, I would So which is first, the chicken or the egg? Umm..I can’t say though..it may be egg as it is small.. And then would you be a friend of a child who thinks “It is the chicken first”? Yes, I would.. Ohh! You have a such a friendly heart Daddy is very happy!! So..which is first?? Daddy didn’t gave the answer

Japanese → English

04 Jun 2011 at 01:43

Original Text

サッカーが好きな子と友達になれるかな？
うん、なれるよ
おまえは鶏と卵、どっちが先だと思う？
うーん、分からないけど…卵だと思う
卵の方が小さいから
おまえは鶏が先だと思う子と友達になれるかな？
え？
うん、なれるよ
おまえは心の優しい子だ
パパはとてもうれしいよ
どっちが先？
パパは教えてくれなかった

Translation

Would you be a friend of a child who likes soccer?
Yes, I would
So which is first, the chicken or the egg?
Umm..I can’t say though..it may be egg as it is small..
And then would you be a friend of a child who thinks “It is the chicken first”?
Yes, I would..
Ohh! You have a such a friendly heart
Daddy is very happy!!
So..which is first??
Daddy didn’t gave the answer

Japanese → English 04 Jun 2011 at 02:53
Original Text 「Ａ」についてですが、この装置の番号を見ると「NN」となっており、つまり、台湾工場で準備された装置であることがわかります。ですので、台湾サイドで準備して、Ｈ社へ供給をお願い致します。既に実績があるリピートの装置ですし、その方がスムーズです。	Translation It is about the device “A”, I see the device number as “NN”. This tells me that the device is prepared in Taiwan. So, I request to prepare it on the Taiwan side and supply it to the Company H. This is already tested repeat device but even then it is smooth.

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 11:36
Original Text ●ソニーが誇るディスクメディアテクノロジー、アキュコア（AccuCORE）技術採用 ●傷・埃・汚れに強い高性能なハードコート（アキュコア）を採用 ●ノンカートリッジタイプ ●1回のみの記録が可能 ●4倍速対応ディスク（Blu-ray Disc Recordable Format Version 1.2）記憶容量：25GB（1層） 3枚パック→10mmケース 5枚/10枚/20枚パック→5mmスリムケース	Translation ·Sony’s pride disk media technology, AccuCore technology supports. ·Scratches, dust, and dirt-resistant high-performance hardcoat (AccuCORE) support. ·A non-cartridge type ·One time recording possible ·4 X discs supported (Blu-ray Disc Recordable Format Version 1.2) Storage capacity: 25 GB (single-layer) Three disc packs → 10 mm case 5 / 10 / 20 dics packs → 5 mm slim case

Japanese → English

03 Jun 2011 at 11:36

Original Text

●ソニーが誇るディスクメディアテクノロジー、アキュコア（AccuCORE）技術採用
●傷・埃・汚れに強い高性能なハードコート（アキュコア）を採用
●ノンカートリッジタイプ
●1回のみの記録が可能
●4倍速対応ディスク（Blu-ray Disc Recordable Format Version 1.2）
記憶容量：25GB（1層）
3枚パック→10mmケース
5枚/10枚/20枚パック→5mmスリムケース

Translation

·Sony’s pride disk media technology, AccuCore technology supports.
·Scratches, dust, and dirt-resistant high-performance hardcoat (AccuCORE) support.
·A non-cartridge type
·One time recording possible
·4 X discs supported (Blu-ray Disc Recordable Format Version 1.2)
Storage capacity: 25 GB (single-layer)
Three disc packs → 10 mm case
5 / 10 / 20 dics packs → 5 mm slim case

Japanese → English 02 Jun 2011 at 23:06
Original Text 鶏が先か、卵が先か古くから語り継がれるこの問い人それぞれ様々な見解があるにせよ大多数の人を満足させる結論は未だ出ていないそこで私は新しいアイデアを提供しようと思う Google検索で上位にはない意見この議論に疲れてしまった方も問う事自体に無意味さを感じている方もぜひどうぞさぁ、みんなで哲学を楽しみましょう	Translation Is chicken first or the egg? This question is being handled for years now. Even if there are various opinions on this from each person, there isn't yet any satisfactory conclusion from many of them. Therefore I come up with a new idea. Even Google searching doesn’t give superior opinions. So my idea is, I would boost to keep this argument going to the person who is tired arguing on this and also to a person who feels that this argument itself a nonsense thing…and with this thought going, let’s enjoy the philosophy.

Japanese → English

02 Jun 2011 at 23:06

Original Text

鶏が先か、卵が先か
古くから語り継がれるこの問い
人それぞれ様々な見解があるにせよ
大多数の人を満足させる結論は未だ出ていない
そこで私は新しいアイデアを提供しようと思う
Google検索で上位にはない意見
この議論に疲れてしまった方も
問う事自体に無意味さを感じている方もぜひどうぞ
さぁ、みんなで哲学を楽しみましょう

Translation

Is chicken first or the egg?
This question is being handled for years now.
Even if there are various opinions on this from each person, there isn't yet any satisfactory conclusion from many of them. Therefore I come up with a new idea.
Even Google searching doesn’t give superior opinions.
So my idea is, I would boost to keep this argument going to the person who is tired arguing on this and also to a person who feels that this argument itself a nonsense thing…and with this thought going, let’s enjoy the philosophy.

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 00:33
Original Text 最初に一つ確認しておく事がありますそれは「正しさ」と「真実」の違いについてです正しさとは人間が決めた基準に沿って正確であれば正しいと認められます昔の人は天動説を正しいと認めていました今は地動説を正しいと認めていますそれぞれの時代や、文化、国によって基準は異なりますがそれらは皆正しいと言えます	Translation At first I want to get confirmed about a thing It is about the difference between “Correctness” and “Truth”. Actually “Correctness” means if it is accurate along with the standards decided by human beings then it is accepted as “Correctness” The older generation approved the correctness of a thing by the Ptolemaic theory. Nowadays they accept the Copernican theory. The standards keep on changing according to time, culture and country but it may be said that all of them are right.

Japanese → English

03 Jun 2011 at 00:33

Original Text

最初に一つ確認しておく事があります
それは「正しさ」と「真実」の違いについてです
正しさとは人間が決めた基準に沿って正確であれば正しいと認められます
昔の人は天動説を正しいと認めていました
今は地動説を正しいと認めています
それぞれの時代や、文化、国によって基準は異なりますが
それらは皆正しいと言えます

Translation

At first I want to get confirmed about a thing
It is about the difference between “Correctness” and “Truth”.
Actually “Correctness” means if it is accurate along with the standards decided by human beings then it is accepted as “Correctness”
The older generation approved the correctness of a thing by the Ptolemaic theory.
Nowadays they accept the Copernican theory.
The standards keep on changing according to time, culture and country but it may be said that all of them are right.

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 01:15
Original Text では、話を本題に戻しましょう「鶏が先か、卵が先か」 1鶏 2卵 3その他の答私たちが求めている答は「真実」それとも「正しさ」？それについて考えてみませんか？	Translation So now let's return to our main topic of “Is chicken first or the egg?” 1st option chicken 2nd option egg 3 rd option other Are the answers we seek ”Correct or Accurate” Don’t you want to think over that?

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 01:45
Original Text もし真実の答が知りたいのであれば鶏や卵の定義を全知全能の者に決めてもらわねばなりません真実は人間の価値観に影響を受けないので人間が定義を決める事が出来ないのですそうなると真実の答は全知全能の者に聞くしかありませんでも人間はその者と会話が出来ないので知る事が出来ませんなのでこの様な結論に達します真実の答は一つに限定できるが、人間はそれを知る事が出来ない	Translation If you want an answer to definition of “Truth”, you must have an almighty knowledgeable person to decide on the definition of the chicken and the egg. A human being can't decide a definition because I don’t believe that it can be judged on the concept of values by human beings. But then only an almighty knowledgeable person can give the answer to “Truth”. But we human beings cannot have conversation with such an almighty knowledgeable person. So I reach to such a conclusion:” Though there can be more than one answers to the defination of ‘Truth’ human beings do not have the knowledge to define it”.

Japanese → English

03 Jun 2011 at 01:45

Original Text

もし真実の答が知りたいのであれば
鶏や卵の定義を全知全能の者に決めてもらわねばなりません
真実は人間の価値観に影響を受けないので人間が定義を決める事が出来ないのです
そうなると真実の答は全知全能の者に聞くしかありません
でも人間はその者と会話が出来ないので知る事が出来ません
なのでこの様な結論に達します
真実の答は一つに限定できるが、人間はそれを知る事が出来ない

Translation

If you want an answer to definition of “Truth”, you must have an almighty knowledgeable person to decide on the definition of the chicken and the egg.
A human being can't decide a definition because I don’t believe that it can be judged on the concept of values by human beings.
But then only an almighty knowledgeable person can give the answer to “Truth”.
But we human beings cannot have conversation with such an almighty knowledgeable person.
So I reach to such a conclusion:” Though there can be more than one answers to the defination of ‘Truth’ human beings do not have the knowledge to define it”.

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 02:10
Original Text この問いを鶏と卵のみに限定せず他の生き物に適応したり赤子と成人、種の違い、生命の誕生とは？などに展開する意見が出てもそれらの考えを否定する事は出来ないなぜなら人間は皆、正しさの基準を考える権利を有しているから	Translation I don’t want to limit this question only to egg and chicken but also want to have views on question of other living things like Baby first or Adult, Seed first or Tree, Birth first or Life? And finally I can't deny those thoughts because all the human beings have a right to think about a standard to the definition of “Correctness”

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 02:55
Original Text つぎは正しい答は？を考えてみましょうこの場合鶏や卵の定義を人間が決めて良い事になります正しさは人間が決めた基準に沿って判断するからですさらにどのような理論を基準に優劣を判断するか？も決める事が出来ます進化論、生物学、遺伝学、創世記、語意…etc 但しこの場合「誰が決めるのか？」が問題になりますこの問いを作り出した者は既に他界していて聞く事が出来ないからです	Translation Now what about the definition of “Correctness”? Let’s think about it. It is a good that this time human beings can decide on the definition of chicken or egg. As they have a judgment to think about a standard to the definition of “Correctness” In addition it is also possible to decide which of the theory (such as theory of evolution, biology, genetics, Genesis, word meanings ... etc) is used to judge the merits by standards. But in this case the question is "who will decide?” The reason is because the person who created these questions has already passed away and can't listen to it.

Japanese → English

03 Jun 2011 at 02:55

Original Text

つぎは正しい答は？を考えてみましょう
この場合鶏や卵の定義を人間が決めて良い事になります
正しさは人間が決めた基準に沿って判断するからです
さらにどのような理論を基準に優劣を判断するか？も決める事が出来ます
進化論、生物学、遺伝学、創世記、語意…etc
但しこの場合「誰が決めるのか？」が問題になります
この問いを作り出した者は既に他界していて聞く事が出来ないからです

Translation

Now what about the definition of “Correctness”? Let’s think about it.
It is a good that this time human beings can decide on the definition of chicken or egg.
As they have a judgment to think about a standard to the definition of “Correctness”
In addition it is also possible to decide which of the theory (such as theory of evolution, biology, genetics, Genesis, word meanings ... etc) is used to judge the merits by standards.
But in this case the question is "who will decide?” The reason is because the person who created these questions has already passed away and can't listen to it.

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 03:29
Original Text 一方真実とは人間の決めた基準に影響を受けません仮に全知全能の存在がいた場合その者は真実を決める事が出来ますしかし、人間はその真実を知る事が出来ませんなぜなら全知全能の者と会話が出来ないからです「正しさ」：知る事は出来るが答を一つに限定できない「真実」：答を一つに限定できるが知る事は出来ない一部例外として「πの値は一つ」等の真実がありますが今回の議題ではないので無視します	Translation On the other hand I don’t agree with the standards decided by human beings human for the definition of “Truth”. We can only define it with existence of “The Almighty” But, human beings can’t know the definition, as there is not any possibility to have conversation with the almighty person. So I sum up the two definitions as: “Correctness”: Human beings know the meaning of this definition but it is not limited to only one. “Accurate”: This definition has only one meaning but human beings don’t know it. But as an exception to the above statement, we find definition of truth in case such as (π has a single value ) But as this is not the point of discussion right now so I ignore it.

Japanese → English

03 Jun 2011 at 03:29

Original Text

一方真実とは人間の決めた基準に影響を受けません
仮に全知全能の存在がいた場合その者は真実を決める事が出来ます
しかし、人間はその真実を知る事が出来ません
なぜなら全知全能の者と会話が出来ないからです
「正しさ」：知る事は出来るが答を一つに限定できない
「真実」：答を一つに限定できるが知る事は出来ない
一部例外として「πの値は一つ」等の真実がありますが
今回の議題ではないので無視します

Translation

On the other hand I don’t agree with the standards decided by human beings human for the definition of “Truth”. We can only define it with existence of “The Almighty”
But, human beings can’t know the definition, as there is not any possibility to have conversation with the almighty person.
So I sum up the two definitions as:
“Correctness”: Human beings know the meaning of this definition but it is not limited to only one.
“Accurate”: This definition has only one meaning but human beings don’t know it.
But as an exception to the above statement, we find definition of truth in case such as (π has a single value )
But as this is not the point of discussion right now so I ignore it.

Japanese → English 03 Jun 2011 at 05:08
Original Text 従って我々が導き出せる判断は「誰でも良い」となりますなので定義や判断基準は人それぞれ自由に決めて構わないと言う事ですそしてそれらの基準に合わせて適切であればどのような答に辿り着いても全て「正しい答」と認められます複数ある「正しい答」同士が相反していても、全て正しいのですなのでこの様な結論に達します正しい答を我々は知る事が出来る、しかし答を一つに限定する事は出来ず相反する答も認めなければならないなぜなら人間は皆、価値観が違うからである	Translation Therefore, the judgment we derive is like "anyone is good”, so I want to say is, it is ok even if definition and judgment standard is decided at ease of every person. And if all those standards are altogether appropriate then even if it is any kind of answer it is approved altogether as ” a right answer”. Many times though we mutually disagree " a right answer" as altogether it is correct so we arrive to such a conclusion. We know the right answers but without limiting it to only one answer we should also accept the contradictory answer as all human beings have different form of perceptions.

Japanese → English

03 Jun 2011 at 05:08

Original Text

従って我々が導き出せる判断は「誰でも良い」となります
なので定義や判断基準は人それぞれ自由に決めて構わないと言う事です
そしてそれらの基準に合わせて適切であれば
どのような答に辿り着いても全て「正しい答」と認められます
複数ある「正しい答」同士が相反していても、全て正しいのです
なのでこの様な結論に達します
正しい答を我々は知る事が出来る、
しかし答を一つに限定する事は出来ず
相反する答も認めなければならない
なぜなら人間は皆、価値観が違うからである

Translation

Therefore, the judgment we derive is like "anyone is good”, so I want to say is, it is ok even if definition and judgment standard is decided at ease of every person.
And if all those standards are altogether appropriate then even if it is any kind of answer it is approved altogether as ” a right answer”.
Many times though we mutually disagree " a right answer" as altogether it is correct so we arrive to such a conclusion.
We know the right answers but without limiting it to only one answer we should also accept the contradictory answer as all human beings have different form of perceptions.

Japanese → English 02 Jun 2011 at 10:31
Original Text 全ての答えは売り場にある	Translation You can get all the answers at the sales counter.

Japanese → English ★★☆☆☆ 2.0 02 Jun 2011 at 11:09
Original Text 世界の女性ゲーマーが選ぶイケメンのトップ10！ゲームに登場するセクシーな女性のトップ10はよくあるけど、ハンサムな男性のトップ10が無いので作ってみたらしい。ファンのみんなは誰が好き？	Translation The Top 10 good-looking men that all the women gamer choose! There always are the Top 10 sexy women who make up to the game, but not any Top10 handsome men, because they don’t. Who is the favorite of all the fans?

Japanese → English ★★★★☆ 4.0 02 Jun 2011 at 09:58
Original Text 私はあなたを信じていますし、憤慨してもいません。ただ私の予定していた予算よりオーバーしているから、キャンセルしたいだけです。あなたの対応に問題はありませんが、落札をキャンセルして、返金して欲しいのです。	Translation Please don’t be upset, I surely trust you. I just want to cancel the bid because it exceeds the budget that I had planned. There isn't any problem with your correspondence though, but I want to cancel the bid and would be thankful if I get the amount refunded.

Japanese → English 02 Jun 2011 at 02:37
Original Text 落札金額の倍以上の送料を支払うのは難しいです。キャンセルできますか？支払い済のお金はPayPalのRefundで返金してください。	Translation It is difficult to pay the postage of more than the double amount of the successful bid. Is the cancellation possible? Please refund the paid money via Refund of PayPal.

Japanese → English 02 Jun 2011 at 00:25
Original Text 貴店でLladroの商品の購入を検討しているのですが、一つ質問があります。貴店はLladroの正規販売店ですか？貴店で購入したLladroの商品はLAP登録することが可能でしょうか？教えてください。お返事をお待ちしております。	Translation I am looking for purchase of article of Lladro in your store, but there is a one question. Is your store a regular store of Lladro? Please let me know whether the article of Lladro, which I purchased at your store be registered to LAP program? Awaiting your reply.

Japanese → English ★★★★☆ 4.0 01 Jun 2011 at 23:03
Original Text 笑うために何が必要か？	Translation What makes you laugh?

Japanese → English 01 Jun 2011 at 23:17
Original Text オフィス提供の代替に無料で提供して欲しいサポート形態。ご利用規約をお読みいただき、同意いただけた後、登録ボタンを押してください。	Translation This support form is for persons who are willing to offer alternate office tender for free. Please read the terms and conditions, and after your consent press the Register button.

Japanese → English 01 Jun 2011 at 21:35
Original Text ５番目の写真で紹介されているダメージ以外に、傷や、スライドが抜けないなどの問題はあるますか？パイプは、曲がってしまってますか？	Translation Besides the damage seen in 5th photograph is there any other damage or slide-moving problem? Is there bend in the pipe?

jetrans — Translations

Log In