Translation Results Requested Through Conyac Made Public

I have read an email dated the 6th of May sent from S. Therefore I would like to answer for the following 3 points that S minded.
1 The meal was not served from a staff of dormitory on the 30th of April according to the rule.
2 Once confirmed that S is negative on a PCR test, the company would not give permission to take a shower straight away.
3 S thought that an updated rule was not given by the company.

1: Upon the confirmation for all the sections concerned, it was learnt that the meal was not delivered due to a mistake on the dormitory side. This should have apologised to S.
The company has urged the dormitory to ensure the problem never happens again.

2: Once confirmed the PCR test of S, we have consulted with the person who takes responsibility for the infectious disease control of the company, the use of a shower where a designated area has been instructed to S and the dormitory on the 28th of April directly. Please see the attached document. In fact, after the body temperature gets normal, a few days is required for being able to return to the office for work from the company. However, that is a shower in a special area where others cannot access it, so the company gave permission for such a special reason.
3: There is no revision in the rule.
We think that S had been conducted acting a role as a leader in such a circumstance. Would you give us an opportunity to talk directly to S if we have a chance?