後半はCM製作に没頭していた日々と、だからこそコマーシャルではなくて自分の作品を作りたいと思ったという、書道を始めた理由が語られて、現在に至る迄の内容です。
後半で私が面白かったのは、彼の哲学としてと前提の上で、アクションペインティングのジャクソン・ポロックとの違いを語っています。しかし説明が難しいです。
とにかく書のもつミニマルでしかし深い歴史や神秘的な世界を伝える為に入念な準備の上でパフォーマンスにあたっているとのことでした。
私にとってはとても面白い、良いインタビューでした!
Though explanation was quite complicated, What i found interesting in the 2nd half was his philosophy and explanation on difference between Jackson Pollock's action painting
He explained his well preparation for his performance, in order to express minimal but long and fascinating history of calligraphy.
Is was very interesting, good interview for me!
The thing that was interesting to me in the second half was talking about his differences to the action painter Jackson Pollock act as his philosophy. But it's difficult to explain.
Anyway, in order for him to share a profoundly historical and mysterious world with minimal brush strokes he performs after elaborate preparations.
It was very interesting to me and a great interview!
ありがとうございます!