彼らは性能試験ではTAに含まれる型式で3回の試験サイクルを行うことが求められると言いました。
型式AはTAに含まれないので試験要件の範囲外のはずです。
実際にはTAに含まれる型式Bで2回しか試験サイクルを行っていません。
彼らはそのことについて私たちの認識または見解を求めています。
彼らが納得できる説明をしていただけますでしょうか。
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2021/07/13 13:52:42に投稿されました
They said to do 3 times tests with type including TA in the performance test.
As A type is not included in TA, it must be out of needs for the test.
In fact, it has only done trial strokes twice with B type included TA.
They are asking us on that with our knowledge and opinions.
Could you do a good explanation to make them acceptable.
As A type is not included in TA, it must be out of needs for the test.
In fact, it has only done trial strokes twice with B type included TA.
They are asking us on that with our knowledge and opinions.
Could you do a good explanation to make them acceptable.
評価
44
翻訳 / 英語
- 2021/07/13 13:30:12に投稿されました
They said the performance test requires three test cycles of the type included in TA.
Model A is not included in TA and should be outside of the testing requirements.
In fact, we have only conducted two test cycles for Model B included in TA.
They are asking for our understanding or opinion about that.
Could you give me an explanation that makes sense to them?
Model A is not included in TA and should be outside of the testing requirements.
In fact, we have only conducted two test cycles for Model B included in TA.
They are asking for our understanding or opinion about that.
Could you give me an explanation that makes sense to them?
![[削除済みユーザ]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2021/07/13 13:35:52に投稿されました
They said that 3 times trials cycle for the type including in TA is necessary for the performance test.
Type A should be outside the trial on the testing requirement as that is not included in TA.
Type B was conducted twice for the trial cycle including TA actually.
They request our judgement or cognition about it.
Would you explain as they are convinced?
Type A should be outside the trial on the testing requirement as that is not included in TA.
Type B was conducted twice for the trial cycle including TA actually.
They request our judgement or cognition about it.
Would you explain as they are convinced?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2021/07/13 13:29:18に投稿されました
They said that the performance test requires three test cycles to be performed on the models included in the TA.
Type A is not part of the TA, so it should be outside the scope of the test requirement.
In fact, only two test cycles were performed on Model B, which is included in the TA.
They are asking for our understanding or opinion on that.
Can you please provide an explanation that they can understand?
Type A is not part of the TA, so it should be outside the scope of the test requirement.
In fact, only two test cycles were performed on Model B, which is included in the TA.
They are asking for our understanding or opinion on that.
Can you please provide an explanation that they can understand?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2021/07/13 13:39:47に投稿されました
They said, as for performance test, it is required to carry out test cycle 3 times test cycle for models to be included in TA.
Model A is not included in TA, so Model A should be out of test requirement.
Actually, we just execute test cycle twice for Model B, which actually is part of TA.
They require us to show them our recognition or our comment.
Will you please make a explanation that they can understand?
Model A is not included in TA, so Model A should be out of test requirement.
Actually, we just execute test cycle twice for Model B, which actually is part of TA.
They require us to show them our recognition or our comment.
Will you please make a explanation that they can understand?
