Translator Reviews ( Japanese → English )

Rating: 50 / 2 Reviews / 30 Oct 2014 at 15:55

sujiko
sujiko 50 IT、金融などを中心として社内翻訳者を数年経験後、フリーランス翻訳者として...
Japanese

ばかげたことに、材料の購入価格を5%引き下げるために20%のリワークが生じてしまっている。ただちに供給業者を変更しリワーク率を下げなければならない。しかし供給業者を再度変えるだけでは十分ではなく、そもそもなぜ今の供給業者に変えたのかについても考える必要がある。根本にある問題は購買部門の評価基準である。たとえ標準価格を下回っていても20%のリワークを生み出す材料を使っていては本末転倒なので、材料の質に関しても評価基準を設定し、購買部門に材料の質に対して責任を与えるべきだ。

English

It is foolish that we have 20 percent rework in order to increase the purchase price by 5 percent. We have to change the supplier immediately, and reduce the rework.
However, it is not sufficient only to change the supplier again.
We have to consider why we had changed to the supplier that we have business with now.
The original problem is an assessment standard of the purchasing department.
Even if it is less than the standard price, it is quite contradictiory if we use the wood that produces 20 percent rework.
Regarding the quality of the wood, we have to set the assessment standard, and make the purchasing department be responsible for the quality of the wood.

Reviews ( 2 )

ozsamurai_69 60 ー 日本語能力試験1級合格 ー 翻訳・通訳 英和<->和英 7年本田株式...
ozsamurai_69 rated this translation result as ★★★★ 31 Oct 2014 at 18:36

gj

Add Comment
fujisawa_2014 52 エンジニアリング、自然科学、社会科学での知識と経験があります。
fujisawa_2014 rated this translation result as ★★★ 31 Oct 2014 at 18:42

original
It is foolish that we have 20 percent rework in order to increase the purchase price by 5 percent. We have to change the supplier immediately, and reduce the rework.
However, it is not sufficient only to change the supplier again.
We have to consider why we had changed to the supplier that we have business with now.
The original problem is an assessment standard of the purchasing department.
Even if it is less than the standard price, it is quite contradictiory if we use the wood that produces 20 percent rework.
Regarding the quality of the wood, we have to set the assessment standard, and make the purchasing department be responsible for the quality of the wood.

corrected
It is foolish that we face 20 percent of rework in order to decrease the purchase price by 5 percent. We have to change the supplier immediately, and reduce the rework.
However, it is not sufficient only to change the supplier again.
We have to consider why we had changed to the supplier that we have business with now.
The original problem is the assessment standard of the purchasing department.
Even if it is less than the standard price, it is quite contradictiory if we use wood that produces 20 percent rework.
Regarding the quality of the wood, we have to set an assessment standard, and make the purchasing department be responsible for the quality of the wood.

Add Comment