お世話になっております。
昨日はどうもありがとうございました。
簡単ですが、スカイプ検品の議事録を送らせていただきます。
特に問題のなかった商品に関しましては記載しません。
280004 【SF LEATHER HIGH STOOL】
高さが68.5cmでした。(仕様書は67cm)今回は68.5cmで構いませんが、
次回以降は仕様書の記載サイズを必ず守って頂くようお伝えください。
評価
44
翻訳 / 英語
- 2018/03/29 14:29:30に投稿されました
Thank you for your continued support.
I appreciate you attended the Skype inspection meeting yesterday.
I am sending the Skype inspection meeting minutes.
I just skipped comments on the products which were fine.
280004 [SF LEATHER HIGH STOOL]
The height of the product was 68.5cm. (The spec sheet defines this as 67cm.) It is only OK for this time that the height is 68.5cm, but please let the manufacturer know that they have to follow the dimensions mentioned in the specification sheet from next time onward.
I appreciate you attended the Skype inspection meeting yesterday.
I am sending the Skype inspection meeting minutes.
I just skipped comments on the products which were fine.
280004 [SF LEATHER HIGH STOOL]
The height of the product was 68.5cm. (The spec sheet defines this as 67cm.) It is only OK for this time that the height is 68.5cm, but please let the manufacturer know that they have to follow the dimensions mentioned in the specification sheet from next time onward.
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2018/03/29 14:30:32に投稿されました
Thank you for your support.
Thank you very much about yesterday.
It is so simple, but I will send the minutes of inspection the item by Skype.
I do not list an item that has no problem.
280004(SF Leather High Stool)
The height was 68.5 centimeters. (It is 67 centimeters in specification) 68.5 centimeters is fine this time. But after the next time, would you tell to comply with the size listed in the specification?
Thank you very much about yesterday.
It is so simple, but I will send the minutes of inspection the item by Skype.
I do not list an item that has no problem.
280004(SF Leather High Stool)
The height was 68.5 centimeters. (It is 67 centimeters in specification) 68.5 centimeters is fine this time. But after the next time, would you tell to comply with the size listed in the specification?
