箱やパック等の梱包にでさえ、微細な汚れやキズ、折れ等が有った場合でも、
返品してくる人がいます。
当社ではそこまで厳しく不良品として区別しませんが、
日本の常識に適合した基準で良品と不良品を区別しております。
御社の製品の信頼を保つ為に、ご理解いただけますと幸いです。
また、当社では十分気を付けていますが、
御社に対して、重複して不良品を報告しないように、
不良品を御社に返送する事を提案します。
そうすれば重複して返金される事を防げると思います。
もしくは他に良い案は有りませんでしょうか？
![[削除済みユーザ]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
評価
44
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/10/17 21:33:28に投稿されました
Some people return items when they find small stains, minor scratches and folds etc. on boxes and packages.
Our company does not separate defective items that strictly, but we decide where they are defective or good under the standard according to Japan’s common sense.
We would appreciate your understanding as we need to keep clients’ confidence in your products.
In addition, we are very careful, but we suggest returning defective products to your company in order to avoid reporting the same defect twice.
In this way we think we can avoid refunding doubly.
Do you have any other good idea?
suhirokiさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
Our company does not separate defective items that strictly, but we decide where they are defective or good under the standard according to Japan’s common sense.
We would appreciate your understanding as we need to keep clients’ confidence in your products.
In addition, we are very careful, but we suggest returning defective products to your company in order to avoid reporting the same defect twice.
In this way we think we can avoid refunding doubly.
Do you have any other good idea?
★★★★★ 5.0/1
評価
67
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/10/17 21:32:48に投稿されました
There are people who return their purchased good because there are small stains, scratches or wrinkles on the outer packaging.
We do not deem such items as defective, but our policy when separating good items from defective items is still in accordance with the Japanese common sense.
We would appreciate it if you could understand this, in order to maintain customers' trust in your products.
Also, we are very careful about this, but we propose sending back the defective items to your company, so they will not overlap.
That will prevent redundant refunds.
Do you have any other good idea about this?
suhirokiさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
We do not deem such items as defective, but our policy when separating good items from defective items is still in accordance with the Japanese common sense.
We would appreciate it if you could understand this, in order to maintain customers' trust in your products.
Also, we are very careful about this, but we propose sending back the defective items to your company, so they will not overlap.
That will prevent redundant refunds.
Do you have any other good idea about this?
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/10/17 22:05:12に投稿されました
There are some who try to send back items just because their packages have a slightest fault or crease.
Our examination of items is not that strict, but is in accordance with the standard commonly accepted in Japan,
with which we discern good items and defective ones.
Please understand our policy for keeping our items reliable for customers.
Also, as we ourselves are trying to be careful enough,
to avoid over reporting of defective items to your company,
we propose to send back items to your company.
In this manner we believe we can prevent over refunding from happening.
Or, if you have another nice idea, please inform us of that.
suhirokiさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
Our examination of items is not that strict, but is in accordance with the standard commonly accepted in Japan,
with which we discern good items and defective ones.
Please understand our policy for keeping our items reliable for customers.
Also, as we ourselves are trying to be careful enough,
to avoid over reporting of defective items to your company,
we propose to send back items to your company.
In this manner we believe we can prevent over refunding from happening.
Or, if you have another nice idea, please inform us of that.
評価
33
翻訳 / 英語
- 2014/10/17 23:19:36に投稿されました
Even the packaging of box, pack, etc, fine dirt and scratches, if there is any broken things, there will be some people who come to return it.
In our company strictly devective won't be distinguised, in the common sense of Japan we have to distinguish between good and devective.
In addition, although we careful enough in our company,
For your company, so as not to report defective products in duplicate,
We suggest that you return the defective product to your company.
You think that it is prevented that the refund will be in duplicate if so.
I wonder if it would be there or the other to a good idea?
suhirokiさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
In our company strictly devective won't be distinguised, in the common sense of Japan we have to distinguish between good and devective.
In addition, although we careful enough in our company,
For your company, so as not to report defective products in duplicate,
We suggest that you return the defective product to your company.
You think that it is prevented that the refund will be in duplicate if so.
I wonder if it would be there or the other to a good idea?
