今回Aの構成は少々複雑なので簡単に説明させて下さい。この表はBのデータを元に作成しました。
Aは通常全データがありますが今回B側の事情でそれが整いませんでした。
Bの作成完了まで待つと報告に間に合わないため、私はCとDの差異を確認し、Cに足すもの、Cから引くもの
を一覧にしました。当然Cは精度が高いです。Cとの差異は緑色のタブを参照下さい。これらを整理した表はFを参照下さい。
EとFは同一とみなしています。厳密に両者は異なるかもしれませんが判別出来るデータがBから提供されなかった。
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/08/05 15:56:18に投稿されました
This time A's composition is a bit complex so I'll explain it in a simple way. This table is made based on B's data.
For A, normally all data is there, but due to circumstances in B's side it's still not ready.
Waiting until B's creation is done means we wouldn't make it in time for the report. so I checked the disparity between C and D, and I summarized what is added to C and what is subtracted from C. Of course, C has high precision. Please refer to the green tab for the disparity with C. Refer to F for the table with all these sorted out.
E and F is treated as the same thing. To be precise, both may be different, but the data we need to be able to determine that hasn't been provided by B.
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
For A, normally all data is there, but due to circumstances in B's side it's still not ready.
Waiting until B's creation is done means we wouldn't make it in time for the report. so I checked the disparity between C and D, and I summarized what is added to C and what is subtracted from C. Of course, C has high precision. Please refer to the green tab for the disparity with C. Refer to F for the table with all these sorted out.
E and F is treated as the same thing. To be precise, both may be different, but the data we need to be able to determine that hasn't been provided by B.
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/08/05 15:52:52に投稿されました
This time, the configuration of A is a little complicated, so let me explain briefly. This table was created based on the data B.
A usually has all the data, but this time it was not prepared due to the circumstances on the B side.
I waited until I finished creating B, so I couldn't make it in time for the report, so I checked the difference between C and D, and listed what to add to C and what to subtract from C.
Naturally, C has high accuracy. Please refer to the green tab for the difference from C. Please refer to F for a table listing of these.
E and F are considered the same. Strictly saying, the two may be different, but B did not provide any discriminating data.
A usually has all the data, but this time it was not prepared due to the circumstances on the B side.
I waited until I finished creating B, so I couldn't make it in time for the report, so I checked the difference between C and D, and listed what to add to C and what to subtract from C.
Naturally, C has high accuracy. Please refer to the green tab for the difference from C. Please refer to F for a table listing of these.
E and F are considered the same. Strictly saying, the two may be different, but B did not provide any discriminating data.
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/08/05 15:58:36に投稿されました
As this time's construction is a little complicated, please let me explain. This sheet was based on B data.
A is usually all the data but this time's B side's reason it is not as so.
It cannot be on time if we wait until the B is over, I checked C and D's difference, and make it in a list to add to C and to minus from C.
Of course C is fine. Please refer C's difference to the green tab. The correction of these is you can see the sheet C.
E and F are taken as the same. Maybe strictly the both are different, but the accurate data was not given from B.
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
A is usually all the data but this time's B side's reason it is not as so.
It cannot be on time if we wait until the B is over, I checked C and D's difference, and make it in a list to add to C and to minus from C.
Of course C is fine. Please refer C's difference to the green tab. The correction of these is you can see the sheet C.
E and F are taken as the same. Maybe strictly the both are different, but the accurate data was not given from B.
