頂いたデータの使い方を確認させて下さい。例えばAのVとBのXを比較したい場合、まずC列に○印があるものに絞り、D列も同様○で絞ります
さらにC列で価格が0のもの（0となる理由がよくわかりませんが）を除外します
そうするとC列に差異が現れます。我々はこの値をDと認識しています
他の商品も同様のデータ抽出方法で値を引用しました。
表の見方、データ抽出の考え方は貴殿の認識と相違ないですか？
我々が気になっているのはなぜCが0なのかです。適用ありとされたにも関わらず何故価格0となるのでしょうか
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/02/28 11:52:03に投稿されました
Please let us check how to use the given data. For example, when compared A's V to B's X, first to focus on ○ in the C raw and do the same with D in the raw with ￮.
Further, 0 in price in the C raw (not known why it is 0) is excepted.
To do so, there is a difference in the C raw. We acknowledge this value as D.
We quoted the value by the date to find with other product as well.
Are the methods of how to check and the data finding the same with you?
What we are concerning is why C is 0. Even though it was applied, why the price is 0?
Further, 0 in price in the C raw (not known why it is 0) is excepted.
To do so, there is a difference in the C raw. We acknowledge this value as D.
We quoted the value by the date to find with other product as well.
Are the methods of how to check and the data finding the same with you?
What we are concerning is why C is 0. Even though it was applied, why the price is 0?
![[削除済みユーザ]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
評価
52
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/02/28 11:54:12に投稿されました
Could I make sure how to use the data given, please?
For instance, when comparing between V in A and X in B, at first, focusing data marked ○ in row C, same for row D. And the price at 0 in row C should be excluded(The reason for 0 isn't known, though), then the difference in row C will be appeared.
We are sure the value is D.
For other items, we conducted the same method for data extraction.
Are we same with you that seeing the table and data extraction?
The point we mind is c is 0 in spite of myself.
Even they say "Applied" but why does the price becomes 0?
For instance, when comparing between V in A and X in B, at first, focusing data marked ○ in row C, same for row D. And the price at 0 in row C should be excluded(The reason for 0 isn't known, though), then the difference in row C will be appeared.
We are sure the value is D.
For other items, we conducted the same method for data extraction.
Are we same with you that seeing the table and data extraction?
The point we mind is c is 0 in spite of myself.
Even they say "Applied" but why does the price becomes 0?
評価
51
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/02/28 11:52:32に投稿されました
Let me confirm the usage of the data that I received.
For example, in case of comparing with V of A and X of B, narrow down the data with marked 〇 on row C, then that on D.
After that, exclude the price data of 0 on C (I don't know the reason that they become 0.)
Then, the difference appear on row C. We recognize this value as D.
We quote the values of other items by the same method of extracting data.
Would our recognition be right about how to check the chart and extract the data?
What we care for is the reason that C is 0.
Why does the price become 0 although the data was applicable?
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
For example, in case of comparing with V of A and X of B, narrow down the data with marked 〇 on row C, then that on D.
After that, exclude the price data of 0 on C (I don't know the reason that they become 0.)
Then, the difference appear on row C. We recognize this value as D.
We quote the values of other items by the same method of extracting data.
Would our recognition be right about how to check the chart and extract the data?
What we care for is the reason that C is 0.
Why does the price become 0 although the data was applicable?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/02/28 11:52:50に投稿されました
Please let me check how to use the data you had given to me. For example, if I want to compare V of A and X of B, I select the one where 〇 is listed in C line and select 〇 in D line.
In addition, I exclude the one where price is zero in C line (do not why it is zero).
Then there is a difference in C line. We understand that this value is D.
I quoted other items by the similar way we extract data.
Do I understand how to check the chart and extraction of the data in the same way as you understand?
We are concerned about why C is zero. It was recognized to be applicable, but I wonder why the price is zero?
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
In addition, I exclude the one where price is zero in C line (do not why it is zero).
Then there is a difference in C line. We understand that this value is D.
I quoted other items by the similar way we extract data.
Do I understand how to check the chart and extraction of the data in the same way as you understand?
We are concerned about why C is zero. It was recognized to be applicable, but I wonder why the price is zero?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/02/28 11:53:23に投稿されました
Please allow me to confirm how to use the provided data. For instance, if the V for A needs to be compared with X of B, narrow down with O in column C, and D likewise.
Further, eliminate those which value is zero in column C (the reason for zero value is unknown though).
Then a gap will appear in column C. We recognize the value as D.
The value for other products also quoted the same data extraction method.
Is my understanding for how to interpret the table and the data extraction in accordance with yours?
What bothers us is the reason for C showing the value zero. How come the value shows as zero despite the status is being set as applicable?
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
Further, eliminate those which value is zero in column C (the reason for zero value is unknown though).
Then a gap will appear in column C. We recognize the value as D.
The value for other products also quoted the same data extraction method.
Is my understanding for how to interpret the table and the data extraction in accordance with yours?
What bothers us is the reason for C showing the value zero. How come the value shows as zero despite the status is being set as applicable?
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2020/02/28 11:49:36に投稿されました
Let me confirm how to use the data I received.
For example, if you want to compare the Vof A and the X of B, then the C column should be narrowed to 0, the D column should also be narrowed by 0, and the C column that has 0 value would be deleted (I. e., I don't know why the reason for 0).
We recognize this value as D, and other products quote the value by the same data extraction method.
Is the view of the table and the concept of data extraction different from your understanding?
What we're concerned about is why C is 0.
Why would it cost 0 even though it was applied?
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
For example, if you want to compare the Vof A and the X of B, then the C column should be narrowed to 0, the D column should also be narrowed by 0, and the C column that has 0 value would be deleted (I. e., I don't know why the reason for 0).
We recognize this value as D, and other products quote the value by the same data extraction method.
Is the view of the table and the concept of data extraction different from your understanding?
What we're concerned about is why C is 0.
Why would it cost 0 even though it was applied?
and other products quote the value by the same data extraction method.
→and quote the value of other products by the same data extraction method as well.