現在郵便局と輸送中の損傷について補償について確認中です。代りの商品を確保出来ないか業者と確認しています。申し訳ありませんがお待ち頂けますか。またあなたの計算結果をMさんと確認しました。結論から申し上げると、計算の考え方は問題ないと考えます。我々もOP1の方法をとりますので計算してもほぼ同じ結果になります。少々確認事項があります。Aの適用率はどの様な計算に基づいているか教えて下さい。また奨励金が適切か（なぜ金額を下げられるがその根拠）を確認し説明出来る様にしなければなりません。
評価
50
翻訳 / 英語
- 2016/11/15 05:41:42に投稿されました
We are currently confirming the compensation for the damage during transportation with the post office. We are also checking with the vendor whether we can secure a replacement or not. Our apologies, but please be patient. Furthermore, I have checked with Mr. [M] regarding your calculations results. In conclusion, we believe there is no problem with the way of thinking behind the calculations. We also use OP1 method so if we were to do the calculation we would have come to the same results. There are a few things we would like to confirm. Please tell us the basis for your calculation of [A]'s adoption rate. Also, we need to check whether the subsidy is adequate and be able to explain it (the basis for reducing the amount of money).
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
評価
60
翻訳 / 英語
- 2016/11/15 05:46:10に投稿されました
I am currently checking with Japan Post regarding the damage in transit. I am also checking with a supplier if they can get a replacement. I am sorry, but will you wait? Your calculation result was confirmed by Mr. M and me. If I tell you a conclusion first, we think there is no problem with how you calculated. Our result derived from OP1, which we use, is almost the same as yours. I have a few things I need to confirm with you. Please let me know what formula you used to get A's application rate. Furthermore, a reason why a financial incentive (a logic why the amount of money can be lowered) is appropriate should be able to be made sure and explained.
tgvicektxさんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
