私には非常に単純な論理があり、数々の物はいつもそれ自体で自動的に構成を
なしていると主張してきた、私の構成とは、そういった物を、それ自体がかってに
形成するにまかせておくことで成り立っているのである。
偶然—結局のところ偶然ほど調節出来る物はない。法則に従う偶然の場合、例え
ば量の場合など、それはもう偶然などとは言えないだろう。偶然とは、私のとって
素材であり、空白である。
翻訳 / 英語
- 2016/05/21 20:12:24に投稿されました
I have a quite simple logic and I have been insisting that many things consist automatically by themselves. My constitution exists by letting these things consist by themselves voluntarily.
A fortuity: eventually, there is nothing other than a fortuity that is adjustable. In the case of a fortuity complying with the rule such as the case of an amount, we cannot say that it is a fortuity. A fortuity, for me, is a material and a vacuum.
patyx7さんはこの翻訳を気に入りました
A fortuity: eventually, there is nothing other than a fortuity that is adjustable. In the case of a fortuity complying with the rule such as the case of an amount, we cannot say that it is a fortuity. A fortuity, for me, is a material and a vacuum.
翻訳 / 英語
- 2016/05/21 20:45:40に投稿されました
I have a very simple logic, and I have argued that many things automatically constitute themselves. The essence of the constitution I argue for lies in the automated constitution of a thing of itself. Contingency: there is nothing more adjustable than contingency, after all. If you say contingency follows a law, you can no longer say that it is contingency. Contingency is for me a material, emptiness.
patyx7さんはこの翻訳を気に入りました