原発に対する反対意見はその危険性である。福島原発事故を見れば分かるように、原発は非常に危険である。多くの人が犠牲になり、その被害は今もなお続いている。帰る家がなく、途方に暮れる人も少なくはない。確かに、原発は低コストなエネルギーかもしれないが、人の命にはかえられない。
実際、次地震が起きたら同じような悲惨なことになりかねない。次のデータを見て欲しい。日本の地震発生率は異常だ。このようなデータがあるのにも関わらず、ろくな説明もなく、原発を推進するのは危険であろう。
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Jan 2015 at 22:37
Counter opinion to nuclear power station is concerning it's risk. Nuclear power station is very dangerous as shown in the Fukushima nuclear accident. Many people were sacrificed and the damage remain still now. Not a few people have no home to return and get bewildered. Nuclear power station seems to cost low energy surely, but can't replace with the life of people.
Actually, there is the possiblity to occure a same tragic accident when next earthquake would happen. Please see following data. A rate of earthquake occurrence in Japan is extraordinary. Progressing nuclear power station without enough explanation regardless this kind of data seems dangerous.
Actually, there is the possiblity to occure a same tragic accident when next earthquake would happen. Please see following data. A rate of earthquake occurrence in Japan is extraordinary. Progressing nuclear power station without enough explanation regardless this kind of data seems dangerous.
★★★★☆ 4.0/1
Rating
52
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Jan 2015 at 21:23
Opinions against nuclear energy show how dangerous it is. If you look at Fukushima Nuclear accident, you will understand how dangerous nuclear energy is. Many people lost their lives, and even now damages still continue. People with no house where they can go back to and still at a loss are uncountable. Indeed, nuclear energy may be low-cost, but it cannot replace people's lives.
It is completely possible that the same tragedy happens again at the next earthquake. I want you to have a look at the following data. The frequency of earthquakes in Japan is crazy. Despite those data, there is no good explanation and it is dangerous to still continue promoting nuclear energy.
It is completely possible that the same tragedy happens again at the next earthquake. I want you to have a look at the following data. The frequency of earthquakes in Japan is crazy. Despite those data, there is no good explanation and it is dangerous to still continue promoting nuclear energy.
★★★★☆ 4.0/1
Rating
50
Translation / English
- Posted at 05 Jan 2015 at 21:35
Our objection for nuclear plant is based on risk of nuclear. As we are well aware of the risk of nuclear plant due to Fukushima nuclear plant accident. So many people were sacrificed, we are being suffered from the damage. Some people are at a loss for losing their house. Indeed nuclear power might be low cost energy, but it wouldn't be more import than our life.
Actually, we would face same tragedy if huge earthquake hit Japan. I would like you to see following data. it shows extraordinary rate of earthquake occurrence.
It would be quite dangerous to promote nuclear energy without any enough explanation, regardless of the data.
Actually, we would face same tragedy if huge earthquake hit Japan. I would like you to see following data. it shows extraordinary rate of earthquake occurrence.
It would be quite dangerous to promote nuclear energy without any enough explanation, regardless of the data.
★★★★☆ 4.0/1
