翻訳者レビュー ( 日本語 → 英語 )

備考: ロイ：ROI(region of interest) 　論文査読です．宜しくお願い致します．

日本語

肝のロイが全肝ではないので測定部位により誤差が出る可能性があり．提示画では患者毎のサイズが異なって見える

結果が全体的にわかりにくく表にすべき．後面像でのp値の記載がない．各群でのH値の記載がない

参考文献2は筆者の結論を支持する内容なので，Xまでは言いすぎだと思う．新たな結果が混在しておりまとまりない．結果に全て記載すべき

結論が重複している．最後の一文が長く不明瞭．H=2のcutoffの根拠が不明．HのP値が結果と異なっている

細かい点：(1)と①の表記が混在．7頁８行のXが余計

英語

There might be some errors in RIO depend upon parts of testing because it was not done for whole liver.
Given picture looks different view for each patient.
It is hard to see overall view from the tested result so that we advise you to make table instead because
there is no p value in back picture and H value in each section.

Reference document No.2 shows to support the conclusion by author so that saying X is too much.
Also looks mixed with new results as well makes ambiguous. Should state all the results.

Conclusiion was duplicated. It is unclear because the last sentence is too long.
There's no explanation regarding cutoff at H=2.
P value at H is apart from result.

Definite point:Mixed up with (1) and ①, No need for line 8 in page 7.