Translator Reviews ( Japanese → English )

Japanese

・貢献　味情報を携帯端末上で制御できる機構を構築した．
レシーバーで提示できる刺激を一定程度評価実験で求めた．
コミュニケーションプロセスを明示した．
・強み　味情報のプロトコルとして，新規な手法を提案したところ．
そして熱刺激を電気刺激と一緒に活用できているところ．
一部評価や関連内容との比較、分析は不足しているが，システムの可能性をを議論する内容は揃っている．
・弱み　参考文献の分類が読み手の誤解を招く．
例えば，私は舌への電気刺激は構造上化学的刺激に入ると考えている．

English

*Contribution:
Stimulus that can be expressed by a receiver was obtained to some extent by evaluation experiment.
A communication process was clearly specified.

*Asset:
A new method was proposed for protocol of taste information.
Thermal stimulus can be used together with electric stimulus.
Comparison with a part evaluation and relevant content together with the content with which we can discuss about the system has been prepared. Analyses, however, are still to be done further.

*Liability:
The way of categorization of literature may cause misunderstanding of readers.
For example, I myself think that the electric stimulus is placed in the category of chemical stimulus from structural consideration.