Translator Reviews ( Japanese → English )

Japanese

確認2
ロット配送の内容

各ロットに4個～5個の製品を詰めて発送してくれとの事ですが
この時の注意点で質問があります。
製品重量ですが、1製品が約4オンスです。
この製品を4個～5個詰め込んで、配送の外箱の重量も加算すると1ポンドは超えてしまいます。
この理由により、上記内容で重量を1ポンドいないにおさめるのは難しいと思います。
もしも1ポンドいないにおさめるのであれば、ロット内の製品数を減らす等が必要かもしれません。
上記の問題については私達も何かいい方法がないか？再度検討をしてみますね。

English

Check 2
Delivery lot contents

I have a question regarding your request to packed 4~5 products in each lot.
Regarding product weight, 1 product is about 4 oz.
The weight will exceed 1 pound if 4~5 products were packed in the delivery box plus the weight of the delivery box itself.
Based on this reason, it is difficult to fit the products just like above description below than 1 pound.
If you still want the product to fit below than 1 pound, we need to reduce the number of products in the lot.
We will try to consider again if there is other method to solve above problem.

Reviews ( 1 )

katrina_z rated this translation result as ★★★★ 28 Aug 2013 at 01:34

original
Check 2
Delivery lot contents

I have a question regarding your request to packed 4~5 products in each lot.
Regarding product weight, 1 product is about 4 oz.
The weight will exceed 1 pound if 4~5 products were packed in the delivery box plus the weight of the delivery box itself.
Based on this reason, it is difficult to fit the products just like above description below than 1 pound.
If you still want the product to fit below than 1 pound, we need to reduce the number of products in the lot.
We will try to consider again if there is other method to solve above problem.

corrected
Check 2
Delivery lot contents

I have a question regarding your request to pack 4~5 products in each lot.
Regarding product weight, 1 product is about 4 oz.
The weight will exceed 1 pound if 4~5 products are packed in the delivery box plus the weight of the delivery box itself.
Based on this reason, it is difficult to fit the products just like above and keep it under 1 pound.
If you still want the product to be under 1 pound then we need to reduce the number of products in the lot.
We will try to consider again if there is another method to solve above problem.

[jaypee]

コメントありがとうございます