翻訳者レビュー ( 日本語 → 英語 )

評価: 52 / ネイティブ 日本語 / 1 Review / 2013/08/06 12:46:13

gloria
gloria 52 英語⇔日本語、スペイン語⇒日本語の翻訳が可能です。1990年代前半から英⇔...
日本語

ミランダ、素晴らしいドラフトを送ってくれてありがとう。20条の主張に関しては、付け足すことがありません。10条に関しては相手側が主張責任を負いますが、こちらの反論を用意しておく必要はないでしょうか?以下のような内容になると思います。

1  アスベスト禁止法は貿易法10条に反しない。
1.1 「アスベスト」と「代替製品」は、「同種の産品」に該当しない。
1.2 カナダ産製品について「差別的取扱い」がなされているとはいえない。

英語

Thank you for sending me a great draft, Miranda. As for the assertion relating to the Article 20, I have nothing to add. The other party will be liable for asserting regarting the Article 10, but I think that it would be better for us to prepare a counter-statement. How is your opinion? It would as follows:

(1) The Asbestos Prohibition Act is not in violation of the Article 10 of the Trade Act.
(1)-1 Asbestos and its substitutes do not fall in the same type of products.
(1)-2 It cannot be deemd that products made in Canada is teated in discriminatory manner.

レビュー ( 1 )

mzarco1 50 Hello, I am a translator/interpret...
mzarco1はこの翻訳結果を"★★★★★"と評価しました 2013/08/06 12:55:50

元の翻訳
Thank you for sending me a great draft, Miranda. As for the assertion relating to the Article 20, I have nothing to add. The other party will be liable for asserting regarting the Article 10, but I think that it would be better for us to prepare a counter-statement. How is your opinion? It would as follows:

(1) The Asbestos Prohibition Act is not in violation of the Article 10 of the Trade Act.
(1)-1 Asbestos and its substitutes do not fall in the same type of products.
(1)-2 It cannot be deemd that products made in Canada is teated in discriminatory manner.

修正後
Thank you for sending me a great draft, Miranda. As for the assertion relating to the Article 20, I have nothing to add. The other party will be liable for asserting regarting the Article 10, but I think that it would be better for us to prepare a counter-statement. What is your opinion? It would as follows:

(1) The Asbestos Prohibition Act is not in violation of the Article 10 of the Trade Act.
(1)-1 Asbestos and its substitutes do not fall in the same type of products.
(1)-2 It cannot be deemd that products made in Canada is teated in discriminatory manner.

This is an amazing translation!

gloria gloria 2013/08/07 08:19:41

Thank you!

コメントを追加