こんにちわ！
僕はgithubが大好きなユーザーです。いつも使わせて貰ってます。
質問です。
人気があるリポジトリの中に幾つかメンテナンスされず、pull requestが溜まってしまい沢山forkされてしまっているリポジトリがあります。
これは勿体ないと感じています。
私が提案する解決案として、作者がもうメンテナンスしないと宣言可能にするのと、次のメインの開発者を指定出来るというのはどうかと考えました。
是非先の問題が解決されるのを願っています。
![[deleted user]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/695023b4efd563721d13716b1457bc73.png?d=identicon&mode=crop&r=PG&s=42)
Rating
72
Translation / English
- Posted at 29 Nov 2012 at 21:41
Hello!
I am a user who loves github. I always use it.
I have a question.
There are some repositories among the popular ones that no longer do maintenance, but have collected many pull requests and been forked many times.
I feel like that is a waste.
I would like to propose this solution: if you make it so that it is possible for the developer to declare they are no longer maintaining the repository, it will be possible to appoint the next main developer.
By all means, I am hoping that the problem mentioned above will be solved.
camelmasa likes this translation
I am a user who loves github. I always use it.
I have a question.
There are some repositories among the popular ones that no longer do maintenance, but have collected many pull requests and been forked many times.
I feel like that is a waste.
I would like to propose this solution: if you make it so that it is possible for the developer to declare they are no longer maintaining the repository, it will be possible to appoint the next main developer.
By all means, I am hoping that the problem mentioned above will be solved.
Rating
58
Translation / English
- Posted at 30 Nov 2012 at 07:38
Hello!
I am an user who really likes GitHub. I use it often.
On that note, I have a question. Among the popular repositories, there are many repositories which have been forked, but never have maintenance performed on them and have a build-up of pull requests. This seems like such a waste to me.
I would like to propose a resolution to this. What if, when a creator decides that maintenance may no longer be possible, a secondary main developer can be designated?
I truly hope that there can be some resolution to this problem.
camelmasa likes this translation
I am an user who really likes GitHub. I use it often.
On that note, I have a question. Among the popular repositories, there are many repositories which have been forked, but never have maintenance performed on them and have a build-up of pull requests. This seems like such a waste to me.
I would like to propose a resolution to this. What if, when a creator decides that maintenance may no longer be possible, a secondary main developer can be designated?
I truly hope that there can be some resolution to this problem.
*There are some repositories among the popular ones that are no longer maintained, but have collected many pull requests and been forked many times.